[jira] [Created] (NIFI-12624) ReportingTask: AWSCloudWatchReporterTask

Jorge Machado created NIFI-12624: Summary: ReportingTask: AWSCloudWatchReporterTask Key: NIFI-12624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12624 Project: Apache NiFi Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-8227) Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the whole nifi-standard processors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Machado updated NIFI-8227: Affects Version/s: 1.12.1 > Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the

[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-8227) Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the whole nifi-standard processors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Machado updated NIFI-8227: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the

[jira] [Created] (NIFI-8227) Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the whole nifi-standard processors

Jorge Machado created NIFI-8227: --- Summary: Enable extend of AbstractDatabaseFetchProcessor without adding the whole nifi-standard processors Key: NIFI-8227 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8227

[jira] [Resolved] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Machado resolved NIFI-5119. - Resolution: Won't Fix not a bug > Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452886#comment-16452886 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5119: - [~markap14] So that was really the issue. I was testing with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452347#comment-16452347 ] Jorge Machado edited comment on NIFI-5119 at 4/25/18 2:36 PM: -- We are using

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452347#comment-16452347 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5119: - We are using Kerberos and we have 3 nodes on each of the Nifi

[jira] [Comment Edited] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452248#comment-16452248 ] Jorge Machado edited comment on NIFI-5119 at 4/25/18 1:29 PM: -- Yes, and when

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452248#comment-16452248 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5119: - Yes. and when you pull from B if there is sensitive values set

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452227#comment-16452227 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5119: - If you follow the 5 steps that I described on the Ticket you

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452190#comment-16452190 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5119: - Hi [~joewitt], yes I know we are not there yet. I think we

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5028) CLI - Add a command to list sensitive properties to set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16452163#comment-16452163 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5028: - [~joewitt] I Have a fix for it, but no Unit test yet. Yes let's

[jira] [Created] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

Jorge Machado created NIFI-5119: --- Summary: Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination Key: NIFI-5119 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119

[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-5119) Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive Informations on Destination

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Machado updated NIFI-5119: Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) > Pulling changes from Registry does not respect sensitive

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5028) CLI - Add a command to list sensitive properties to set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16451978#comment-16451978 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-5028: - Actually it would be nice that we could detect if a sensitive

[jira] [Created] (NIFI-4960) Multiple Custom Processors don't work as espected.

Jorge Machado created NIFI-4960: --- Summary: Multiple Custom Processors don't work as espected. Key: NIFI-4960 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4960 Project: Apache NiFi Issue

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3380) Multiple Versions of the Same Component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16383776#comment-16383776 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-3380: - I guys, I saw this and I have multiple version of the same

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3472) Kerberos relogin not working (tgt) after ticket expires for HDFS/Hive/HBase processors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16272934#comment-16272934 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-3472: - [~jtstorck] sure that is only with ticket cache? I think we

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3472) Kerberos relogin not working (tgt) after ticket expires for HDFS/Hive/HBase processors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16272642#comment-16272642 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-3472: - [~jtstorck] How is this going ? The UserGroupInformation spwans

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3472) Kerberos relogin not working (tgt) after ticket expires for HDFS/Hive/HBase processors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16242669#comment-16242669 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-3472: - Hey, so after a lot of debug I found out that this Could Be a

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-3472) PutHDFS Kerberos relogin not working (tgt) after ticket expires

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16106963#comment-16106963 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-3472: - I'm hitting the same problem but with the gethdfs processor:

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4174) GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16085196#comment-16085196 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-4174: - Yeah, you are right. One question: Is there a processor that

[jira] [Resolved] (NIFI-4174) GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Machado resolved NIFI-4174. - Resolution: Won't Fix > GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2 >

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-4174) GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16083577#comment-16083577 ] Jorge Machado commented on NIFI-4174: - After some tests I found out that I don't have connection to the

[jira] [Created] (NIFI-4174) GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2

Jorge Machado created NIFI-4174: --- Summary: GenerateTableFetch does not work with oracle on Nifi 1.2 Key: NIFI-4174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4174 Project: Apache NiFi