Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737#discussion_r190885459
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/RecordStats.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737#discussion_r190885264
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/RecordStats.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737#discussion_r190885214
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/RecordStats.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2738#discussion_r190882563
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-hbase-client-service-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/HBaseClientService.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737
I'm not too familiar with the deep internals of the framework either. What
we've seen is that with the records API it just makes sense to leverage the
provenance system because it already tracks
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2738#discussion_r190710420
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-hbase-client-service-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/HBaseClientService.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448
@pvillard31 @mattyb149 I changed MockPropertyValue's
`evaluateExpressionLanguage(FlowFile)` to AFAICT finally fix the issue. It only
shows up on processors like this one where incoming
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448#discussion_r190665372
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/GetMongo.java
---
@@ -51,14
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448#discussion_r190658948
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/GetMongoIT.java
---
@@ -67,20
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448#discussion_r190658775
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/AbstractMongoProcessor.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448#discussion_r190658748
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/AbstractMongoProcessor.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448
@pvillard31 this should be ready to merge now. Last time I tried it out, it
worked in a running flow.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737
Not sure if I like that approach. The beauty of what we did was it just
puts the data into the provenance repository and there aren't that many
flowfiles to track. Maybe a few hundred thousand
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737
I'm not sure how that'd work out because you need to actually read the
flowfiles and calculate the stats.
---
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2737
NIFI-5231 Added RecordStats processor.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2699
@bartektartanus It fails `TestValidateXml`. If you run those tests, you'll
see that your update doesn't include the `evaluateExpressionLanguage` calls
that are needed to pass validation. So
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2705
@mattyb149 @ottobackwards did a review on this one and approved (but isn't
a committer). His judgment is usually spot on if you want to sign off.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2616
Thanks and np. We need more committers :)
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190230641
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/AttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190227868
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/AttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190227792
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/AttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190232378
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestAttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190232174
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestAttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2711#discussion_r190227552
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/AttributesToCSV.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2705
@joewitt @ottobackwards gave it a +1 and travis likes it. Can you merge?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2616
@mattyb149 can we close this out? It's blocking me from fleshing out the
rest of the CRUD capabilities around the new client service.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615
@mattyb149 changed the query model per the discussion above and changed the
tests to be Groovy so that the inline JSON, etc. would be a lot cleaner to read.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615#discussion_r189753159
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/elasticsearch
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615#discussion_r189727653
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/elasticsearch
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615#discussion_r189727019
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/elasticsearch
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615#discussion_r189705031
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/elasticsearch
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
@ottobackwards I'll add user-defined headers and basic auth support, but
that's it until there's a discussion around a HTTP Connection Service. I think
that would be the place to go crazy
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r189580436
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r189580389
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
@ottobackwards @ijokarumawak Added support for the new
ProxyConfigurationService. Would appreciate a review.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2704
@trixpan @ijokarumawak There are two other tickets referenced, 4196 and
4175(?) in the commit list for this PR. Before I keep squashing, I want to
confirm that you want me to keep going and put 3
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2704
@ijokarumawak I'm going to start reviewing this. Once we get this done, I
could use a hand with a review on
[this](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723) lookup service I wrote which
I'm
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
@ottobackwards I think I might just go ahead and refactor that code now and
get it done in this PR.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
@ottobackwards I grabbed a bunch of code from InvokeHttp and did a little
copy pasta. Please take a look when you get a chance. I think moving the copy
pasta into a shared utility package
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
InvokeHttp has a lot of options, so that might be worth splitting it into
an initial merge and then an improvement that comes in 1.8.
---
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723
NIFI-5214 Added REST LookupService
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2619#discussion_r189434124
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/mongodb/MongoDBLookupService.java
---
@@ -52,68
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2619
@pvillard31 @mattyb149 I updated this to have a clean separation between
the controller and lookup service code and subclassed the lookup service from
SchemaRegistryService. Can one of you do
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615
@mattyb149 I converted it over to be a subclass of `SchemaRegistryService`.
Let me know if it needs anything else.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2714
@mattyb149 Updated it per our email thread about this.
---
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2714
NIFI-5145 Changed the override in MockPropertyValue to use a better wâ¦
â¦ay of passing over null flowfiles in evaluateExpressionLanguage.
Thank you for submitting a contribution
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702
@joewitt @markap14 @bbende Can one of you skim through @david-streamlio's
use of controller services and let me know if you think he should refactor the
names? My gut feeling is that he can
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702#discussion_r188938042
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-pulsar-bundle/nifi-pulsar-client-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/pulsar/pool/ResourcePoolImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702#discussion_r188922684
--- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-pulsar-bundle/.gitignore ---
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+.project
--- End diff --
You should be able to get rid
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702#discussion_r188922865
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-pulsar-bundle/nifi-pulsar-client-service-api/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2712
@mattyb149 @markap14 @pvillard31 this is semi-blocking 2-3 of my commits.
They need to be rebased off of it so I can clean up the hack cited in 5145 from
them. If you could do a quick review, I'd
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2712
@mattyb149 Recreated it. I thought I had fubar'd git, but it turned out to
just be a sync issue between ASF and GitHub.
---
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2712
NIFI-5197 Fixed a bunch of EL scope bugs.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706
Something weird happened with the rebase. Killing this and starting over...
---
Github user MikeThomsen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706#discussion_r188746508
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/schema/access/SchemaAccessUtils.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706#discussion_r188743200
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/schema/access/SchemaAccessUtils.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2707
@mattyb149 +1 LGTM. I can merge.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672#discussion_r188631087
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/GetHBase.java
---
@@ -147,14 +146,6
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706
This one is dependent on 5145 being merged.
---
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2706
NIFI-5197 Fixed a bunch of EL scope bugs in the Mongo processors.
NIFI-5197 Replaced a bunch of expressionLanguageSupported(true) statements
with the right scope.
Thank you
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672
[Added a Jira ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5197) to
track the issue with the invalid scope bugs.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2705#discussion_r188393536
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/AbstractJsonPathProcessor.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672
@mattyb149 I just changed the override to be the one without a parameter. I
agree that there should be a task for squashing the scope bugs, but do the few
that got squashed here need to be cherry
GitHub user MikeThomsen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2705
NIFI-5169 Upgrade to JSONPath 2.4
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2702
Don't worry about others' build errors for now. Master might just be a
little off. TBH, we can even merge the code if the build is failing for reasons
others than your commits so don't worry
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2704
@ijokarumawak haven't had a chance to take a look at this, but have you
tried it against Solr and Elastic yet? I think the latter's APIs do their own
proxy management so that might need a little
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672
@markap14 I added a detailed comment describing why I did what I did and
fixed a few processors that had invalid scopes applied to their properties.
Build seems totally fine now. Let me know
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672#discussion_r188126334
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockPropertyValue.java ---
@@ -202,6 +203,9 @@ public PropertyValue evaluateAttributeExpressions
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2542
@ijokarumawak I went back and looked at the Jira ticket again, and my
interpretation is that what I saw in the screenshots above (with the graph)
matches your description of the behavior you
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1955
@ottobackwards can you compare this against your latest changes and see if
it's still needed?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r188055672
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2699#discussion_r188045964
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ValidateXml.java
---
@@ -72,6
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
@joewitt I think if he were to rebase and drop [this
commit](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614/commits/99a980cc1e6bbb45e64fb3431545023eefb8522c)
it should fix that. What do you think?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2671
@vivekmuniyandi Unrelated, but I don't have your email: consider adding a
MarkLogicLookupService in a future sprint. You can look at HBaseLookupService
and MongoDBLookupService as examples. Might
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
@david-streamlio Ok, I think I figured out what happened. At some point, it
looks like you accidentally did a pull on upstream master into your branch. The
fact that you keep having over 200
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Huh, I just checked out your latest branch and it's clean as a whistle WRT
rebasing and appears 100% up to date w/ the upstream master. So not sure what
the heck is going on here. Try doing
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Ok, I'll take a look. Worst comes to worst, we cherry-pick the heck out of
your commits and play a game of hacky sack with Git and commits to get you back
on track.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672
@pvillard31 can you take a look?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2691#discussion_r187795885
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExtractGrok.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2691#discussion_r187795865
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/resources/default-grok-patterns.txt
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
At that point, this should work now to clear things up hopefully:
`git push origin --force NIFI-4914`
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Bingo! That's what you should be seeing now. Fix the merge conflicts, `git
add` the files and continue (and repeat until it's done)
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Pretty sure we found the culprit:
> Davids-MacBook-Pro:nifi david$ git rebase
That should be `git rebase master`. Not sure what git thinks it's doing,
but it's clearly not do
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Also, run `git rebase --continue` on that branch and tell us what happens.
Copy and paste the output as "code" in the combox (code Markdown helper is the
<> button)
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
I pulled your branch and got a lot of merge conflicts when I tried rebasing
against master. I am pretty sure that @mattyb149 is right or on the right
track. When you followed those four steps
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
Yeah, I think @mattyb149 is right about that. I just pulled your branch
again, did a rebase against master and there was an explosion of conflicts.
Once you resolve those, you have to do `git
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675
@markap14 are you good with this or do you want some additional eyes on it?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r187770744
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2691#discussion_r187770374
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExtractGrok.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2691#discussion_r187770394
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/resources/default-grok-patterns.txt
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2691#discussion_r187720132
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExtractGrok.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187743134
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187742376
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672
@markap14 Any feedback?
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672#discussion_r187481205
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockPropertyValue.java ---
@@ -202,6 +203,9 @@ public PropertyValue evaluateAttributeExpressions
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2614
@david-streamlio don't feel rushed, I was just checking in to see if you
were still tracking this.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2672#discussion_r187470996
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/AbstractMongoProcessor.java
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2518
@ijokarumawak version reverted and building...
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2518
I'll add a patch to revert the version # on the client lib. Since HDP is on
1.1.2 and CDH 5.14 is still on 1.2, I don't think it's safe to jump up to
anything higher than a 1.2 client anyway.
---
501 - 600 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
