[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2020-04-17 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-615490345 Closing this PR in lieu of MINIFICPP-1008. Incorporated ECU core related comments there. Will revisit C2 part of nanofi from this PR in near

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2020-01-27 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-578846776 > > Besides the comments added my main concern is that I still don't feel convinced about the need of implementing thread pools, message

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-12-04 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-561880970 > Besides the comments added my main concern is that I still don't feel convinced about the need of implementing thread pools, message

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-11-26 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-558744961 > @msharee9 Just started the review, I am releasing what I have so far, but I have fundamental questions before continuing the C2 part of

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-11-26 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-558721337 > Next batch of review. > > A general observation: > The new mass of code uses a huge amount of pthread functions. This means that

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-11-26 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-558719974 > I don't think we should implement ringbuffer and threadpool. > Did you check for solutions already available on github? (considering

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-11-25 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-558324183 Please hold off code review on this pull request. There seemed to be a mistake from my side while pushing rebased commit to this branch. It

[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration.

2019-11-25 Thread GitBox
msharee9 commented on issue #674: Minificpp 1007 - ECU C2 integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/674#issuecomment-558324255 Please hold off code review on this pull request. There seemed to be a mistake from my side while pushing rebased commit to this branch. It