Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
I think the issue was that I had left nifi.remote.input.host blank on both
instances. So in the push model it was getting the ip address of the incoming
connection which was my laptop's internal IP tha
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
@ijokarumawak yes they were both running on my laptop which is why I was
wondering how the pull model ends up with the hostname, and the push model ends
up with the ip address. I'll keep digging.
---
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
I used InetAddress.getHostName() to convert ip address to hostname, but if
it can't resolve hostname, it just returns ip address. It depends on network
environment. If `$ host ` command can't res
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
@bbende Are those nifi-1 and nifi-2 running on your laptop with different
port configurations? Then I'd expect s2s.hostname will be the laptop hostname.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
Thanks @ijokarumawak !
I was testing this and I noticed that whenever I do a push model from
nifi-1 to nifi-2, the value of s2s.hostname on the flow file in nifi-2 ends up
being the IP addres
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
Hi @bbende
I've updated unit tests. Please review the tests and merge it if it looks
good. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
@bbende Thanks for the comment. I reconsidered about s2s.address property,
and by focusing only on the downstream flow, I think it probably doesn't matter
whether the flow file came into the flow
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
@ijokarumawak thanks for digging in to this! I closed the other PR.
Everything you described makes sense...
I'm on the fence about the attribute names... lets say we have MiNiFi ->
s2s -> NiFi
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1342
@bbende @randerzander
Sorry for taking long, it took time to confirm results and consider how the
result should be..
Please take a look on the table in previous comment, and let me k
