[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-08 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 +1 LGTM, ran tests and verified comments were incorporated, merging to master --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-07 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @mattyb149 your comments are addressed in the last commit. Thanks for reviewing --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-05 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @mattyb149 all the suggested changes have been addressed in the last commit. I've also included in the additional documentation sample configuration for GMail, so you can use it to play around/test.

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-05 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @mattyb149 I was just trying to reproduce the issue with the hanging thread you described above in relation to ConsumePop3, but I can't. Are you sure that what you saw is related to this processor or

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-04 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 I ran ConsumePop3 against GMail but hadn't seen your comment on all the dynamic properties that need to be set. I started and stopped the processor, but there is a thread continuing to run. Stopped

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-04 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 +1 to the "Additional Details" file for all the dynamic properties, etc. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-08-01 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @olegz, seems like an option. How about adding an additional help file withbthe basics of what you already found? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-07-24 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @olegz what about using the same strategy as PutEmail where the user can configure the socket on runtime?

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-07-24 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 One advise though is that there are additional JavaMail properties that one may need to provide to accomodate specific servers. For example in Gmail you need to specify

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-07-24 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 Digging into the source code for it looks like something is out of compliance with POP3 protocol ```java if (line.startsWith("+OK")) r.ok = true; else if

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-07-24 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @olegz agreed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] nifi issue #710: NIFI-1148 added IMAP/POP3 support

2016-07-24 Thread olegz
Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/710 @trixpan Well, I am not sure what that is (will be looking) and how reliable mailtrap.io is for such testing giving it's description "Fake smtp testing server. Dummy smtp email testing". I've tested it