Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2037
@pvillard31 sorry it's taken me so long to get back to this - it seems to
have slipped between the cracks. I did another review and all looks good
(except it seems that the description of &qu
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2739
@mcgilman I tried testing this. Created a Process Group with 2 processors.
One was STOPPED, the other DISABLED. Clicked on canvas to clear the selection.
Then clicked "Disable" in t
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2739
@mcgilman all looks good now, thanks! Have merged to master.
---
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2509
@zenfenan sorry for the delay and all the back-and-forth on this one, but
I've merged to master now! Many thanks for the PR and sticking with it through
the end. Definitely nice to have
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752
NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronized methods instead â¦
â¦of many atomic values. This is more efficient and uses less heap. Also
noticed that the Logger instance in ProcessorNode
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2753
NIFI-5200: Fixed issue with InputStream being closed when calling Proâ¦
â¦cessSession.read() twice against sequential Content Claims
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192493332
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192494134
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192494945
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192496937
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192492813
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192492212
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192494587
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192496067
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192495631
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192492300
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192493834
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192493590
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2723#discussion_r192495332
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-lookup-services-bundle/nifi-lookup-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/lookup/RestLookupService.java
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752
@mcgilman that's a good call. I pushed a new commit that addresses that. I
also rebased against master, since quite a bit has changed, and all still seems
to work well.
---
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2770
NIFI-5279: Allow components up to 50 milliseconds to complete validatâ¦
â¦ion before returning from update request
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2770
For those reviewing, the simplest way to verify the fix is to create a
DebugFlow processor. Set the "CustomValidate Pause Time" property to "70
millis" and when you apply the up
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2771
@mcgilman thanks, was able to verify that the logic makes sense, all looks
good. +1 merged to master.
---
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2772
NIFI-5281: If value is not valid according to the schema's CHOICE fiâ¦
â¦eld, JSON Writer should write null value instead of throwing
NullPointerException
Thank you for submitt
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2774
[WIP] NIFI-4508: Update ConsumeAMQP to use basicConsume API instead of
basicGet in order to provide better performance
This PR is not ready to be merged. However, I wanted to go ahead and
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652
NIFI-1280: Renamed FilterCSVColumns to QueryFlowFile; introduced readers
and writers as controller services
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1654
NIFI-3678: Ensure that we catch EOFException when reading header infoâ¦
â¦rmation from WAL Partition files; previously, we caught EOFExceptions
when reading a 'record' from the WAL bu
Github user markap14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1654
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1655
NIFI-3679: Added Avro Content Viewer
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1656
NIFI-3678
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652
@olegz thanks for reviewing! Just a heads up - I pushed a new commit to
address some RAT exclusions and checkstyle violations -- i had forgotten to run
the -Pcontrib-check before creating the PR
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110645816
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/.gitignore
---
@@ -0,0 +1
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110645869
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/csv
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110646007
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110646390
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110646586
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110647404
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/QueryFlowFile.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110647534
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652#discussion_r110647631
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/repository
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1652
ok @olegz @mattyb149 I have submitted a new commit that addresses all of
the feedback above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1668
NIFI-3658: Created processor for converting records between data formâ¦
â¦ats with like schemas
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1681
NIFI-3682: Add "Schema Access Strategy" and "Schema Write Strategy" Record
Readers and Writers; bug fixes.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In
Github user markap14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1681
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
NIFI-3682: Add Schema Access Strategy and Schema Write Strategy Recorâ¦
â¦d Readers and Writers; bug fixes.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1668#discussion_r112283576
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ConvertRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1668#discussion_r112284424
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ConvertRecord.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1668
@mattyb149 I've pushed another commit that should address the property
names.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1672
@mcgilman looks good. I agree with the logic change and code looks clean.
Everything appears to still work well. Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682#discussion_r112444804
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682#discussion_r112449062
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682#discussion_r112450884
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682#discussion_r112450731
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682#discussion_r112517204
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
I think I've got the things wrapped up that we've discussed here. However,
I did realize that avro schemas define a default value and a set of aliases,
which we don't take into
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
OK @joewitt I think the latest push here addresses all of the issues
raised. Please let me know if you find any other concerns. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
@joewitt you're right - the schema text should be marked as optional. I
think we can also tighten up the validation a bit for the writers to ensure
that the Schema Access Strategy and Schema
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1642
@trixpan sorry - the email that github sent me got lost in my inbox. Just
saw it. I think the logic here is still not quite right, though. And I think I
may have actually misunderstood what was
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112956387
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-data-provenance-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance/AESProvenanceEventEncryptor.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,237
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112957440
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-data-provenance-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance/CryptoUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112958054
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-data-provenance-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance/CryptoUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112963050
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-provenance-repository-bundle/nifi-persistent-provenance-repository/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112965910
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-provenance-repository-bundle/nifi-persistent-provenance-repository/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/provenance
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r112966396
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-provenance-repository-bundle/nifi-persistent-provenance-repository/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/provenance
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto one thought regarding the StaticKeyProvider... rather than
having a .key= perhaps it would make sense to instead use a
.key.= property scheme. This would allow multiple Key ID's
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686#discussion_r113019393
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-data-provenance-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/provenance/CryptoUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
@joewitt I've pushed another commit that I think addresses your concerns
above. Re: the GrokReader, if you are using a "SELECT * FROM FLOWFILE..." type
of query then I agree it is a b
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1682
Good catch, @joewitt. Pushed another commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1664
This looks good to me. Code is clean and makes sense. Contrib-check passes
with all unit tests. +1 merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1695
NIFI-3739: Added ConsumeKafkaRecord_0_10 and PublishKafkaRecord_0_10 â¦
â¦processors
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1706
NIFI-3717: Added HortonworksSchemaRegistry
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1707
NIFI-3659: Added Processor to Split a FlowFile consisting of Record-oâ¦
â¦riented data into multiple FlowFiles, each containing a subset of the
original FlowFile's records
Thank yo
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1706#discussion_r113759624
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-hwx-schema-registry-bundle/nifi-hwx-schema-registry-nar/pom.xml
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+
+
Github user markap14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1706#discussion_r113762440
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-hwx-schema-registry-bundle/nifi-hwx-schema-registry-service/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/schemaregistry
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1706
@joewitt I think I've addressed all of the comments above, except for the
naming. Let me know if you think we need to change the class name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user markap14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1706
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto @YolandaMDavis just a quick update on my review... I think the
code looks good and am a +1 on that front. I had no problem getting this up &
running and things seem to work well. I
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1717
NIFI-3760: Fixed issue that caused session to continually poll from tâ¦
â¦he same connection when using ProcessSession.get(FlowFileFilter, Set)
Thank you for submitting a contribution to
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1695
@joewitt agreed on all fronts. Will push a new commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1695
@joewitt agreed. Pushed a new commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1695
@joewitt excellent! Thanks for such a diligent review & testing - you're
certainly keeping me on my toes! ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1725
@mcgilman @scottyaslan server-side code looks fine. Rebuilt and deployed to
same flow that was having problems before. All looks good! +1 from me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1727
NIFI-3768: Avoid wrapping FlowFile Attributes Map in an UnmodifiableMâ¦
â¦ap in the StandardFlowFileBuilder
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1728
NIFI-3739: Pass the proper InputStream to RecordSetWriterFactory in oâ¦
â¦rder to obtain RecordSetWriter; also fix error handling so that we don't
kill kafka client if unable to create w
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1729
Looks good to me. Thanks for updating the doc! +1 merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1735
NIFI-3775: Ensure that a '0' byte is written out to Hortonworks Encodâ¦
â¦ed Schema Reference header to indicate that GenericRecord is being used
Thank you for submitting a co
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1742
NIFI-3787: Addressed NPE and ensure that if validation fails due to Râ¦
â¦untimeException, that it gets logged. Also clarified documentation for
Json Reader services
Thank you for
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1762
NIFI-2268: Instead of allowing HandleHttpRequest to run constantly caâ¦
â¦lling BlockingQueue.poll() as fast as possible, call
BlockingQueue.poll(2, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) to avoid
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1772
NIFI-3838: Initial implementation of RecordPath and UpdateRecord procâ¦
â¦essor
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1772
@joewitt good catch. Addressed the versioning info.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1768
@ijokarumawak thanks for the PR, and for catching the bug. Verified that
NiFi was exhibiting the behavior that you described before and that after the
PR the behavior was as-expected. +1 merged to
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1778
NIFI-3860: Relax the constraint that the ProcessSession must always bâ¦
â¦e given the most up-to-date version of a FlowFile
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1779
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1779
All looks good. Thanks for catching this one too, @ijokarumawak! +1 merged
to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1772
@mattyb149 I just pushed a new commit that should address the issue that
you noticed here with the differing schemas. I added unit tests to verify as
well. I just noticed your comment about the
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1772
@mattyb149 updated docs. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1772
@mattyb149 I also ran into an issue when comparing Integer values to Long
values so I pushed one more commit to handle that case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1778
@joewitt good catches. I have pushed another commit that I think will
address all of the concerns above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1792
@champagst - was able to verify the issue with your template. Then applied
the PR and verified that it addressed the problem. Many thanks again! Merged
this to master. Excited to see this getting
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1804
NIFI-3900: Ensure that when we serialize a flow to send to Cluster Coâ¦
â¦ordinator that we include the Scheduled State for processors as they are
intended to be, not as they are currently
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1805
NIFI-3905: When a Provenance Query is submitted to WriteAheadProvenanâ¦
â¦ceRepository, purge any obsolete queries from the internal state before
rejecting the query due to 'too many outsta
201 - 300 of 1392 matches
Mail list logo
