Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131993623
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/FlowResource.java
---
@@ -640,7
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131996939
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983295
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983144
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131985592
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/dao/impl/StandardProcessGroupDAO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131979395
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/ProcessGroupDTO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r132005935
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983043
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131998273
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131979744
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131999511
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131994112
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/FlowResource.java
---
@@ -640,7
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983689
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
Thanks @alopresto! This has been merged to master. I accidentally forgot to
add the 'This closes...' text to the commit message. Would you mind closing
this PR out? Thanks!
---
If your project
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
@alopresto These refactorings look good. The backward compatibility support
for legacy configurations is also solid. One minor thing I'd like to
investigate further if we can remove the dependency
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3#discussion_r131141483
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/NiFiRegistry.java
---
@@ -18,22 +18,69 @@
import
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3#discussion_r131150677
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/NiFiRegistry.java
---
@@ -43,28 +90,242 @@ public void run
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r131135419
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130962746
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
9.4.3.v20170317
4.10.4
4.2.4.RELEASE
-4.0.3.RELEASE
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130962379
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130943341
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130884930
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130882716
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130879118
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130878806
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130878563
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130873359
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130871309
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047
NIFI-4210: Add support for OpenId Connect
NIFI-4210:
- Introducing support for OpenId Connect.
- Updating REST API and UI to support the authorization code flow.
You can merge this pull
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
Great find @YolandaMDavis! Will address this and update. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2023
@bond- Another commit has been pushed which includes a brief example for
NiFi specific configuration. I am not super familiar with proxy configurations
so if you have any additional suggestions
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
Thanks @trixpan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2023
NIFI-4206: Proxy instructions in Admin Guide
NIFI-4206:
- Updating admin guide to include instructions for running NiFi behind a
proxy.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
NIFI-4032: Managed Ranger Authorizer
NIFI-4032: Managed Ranger Authorizer
- Introducing the ManagedRangerAuthorizer.
- Introducing the AuthorizationAuditor.
- Updating authorization
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127742238
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/status/ProcessorStatus.java
---
@@ -234,6 +245,7 @@ public ProcessorStatus clone
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127739416
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-cluster/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/cluster/coordination/http/endpoints
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127741268
--- Diff:
nifi-framework-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/status/history/StatusHistory.java
---
@@ -41,4 +41,9 @@
* @return List
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127741006
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/FlowController.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
@markap14 this sounds like a good approach. Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/1
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2001
Thanks @jtstorck! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2001
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1999
Thanks @m-hogue! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1999
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1996
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1996
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2000
I've updated the fix version on the JIRA so we'll catch it for 2.0.0.
Unfortunately, I cannot close the PR without a commit. Only the person that
created the PR can do so. Do you mind closing
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2000
Thanks for the PR @m-hogue. I almost made this fix myself awhile back and
held off. Technically, this class is part of a domain model for the REST API.
Folks should be able to use this model
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1995
Thanks @markap14. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978
@pvillard31 A second commit has been pushed updating the documentation and
providing an example of the composite configurable user group provider. Thanks
again for the review!
---
If your project
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1962
Thanks @pvillard31! Most recent update looks great. This has been merged to
master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978#discussion_r125994624
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -464,6 +464,17 @@ Another option for the UserGroupProvider
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978#discussion_r125987445
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -464,6 +464,17 @@ Another option for the UserGroupProvider
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
Thanks @markap14! The update has addressed the test failures and this has
been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1980
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
@markap14 Looks like the proposed changes are causing unit test failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1980
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1962
@pvillard31 Just started reviewing this PR. I'm wondering if the property
should be associated with the cluster section instead of the web properties.
This property is only relevant when clustered
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978
NIFI-4127: Composite User Group Providers
NIFI-4127:
- Introducing composite ConfigurableUserGroupProvider and UserGroupProvider.
- Adding appropriate unit tests.
- Updating object model
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1923
Thanks @pvillard31 for having a look at this PR! I've addressed the two
issues above and I think resolving the group name when searching users only and
detecting group membership is supported. Check
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1923
NIFI-4059: Introduce LdapUserGroupProvider
NIFI-4059:
- Introducing the LdapUserGroupProvider.
- Updating documentation accordingly.
- Moving the IdentityMapping utilities so they were
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1900
Yup. Thanks again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1900
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1900
Thanks for catching those @jtstorck! Will update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1897
For those reviewing... just pushed a follow-up commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1897
I'll be posting another commit to this PR to more easily allow providers to
map their users, groups, and policies to the internal data model. Also, have
minor documentation and error message tweaks
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1903
NIFI-4045: POST lineage may not respond with eventId
NIFI-4045:
- Addressing issues causing the eventId to not be relayed when submitting a
lineage request under certain conditions.
You can
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1900
NIFI-4019: Added support for X-Forwarded-* headers
NIFI-4019:
- Adding support for X-Forwarded-* headers.
- Unrelated code clean up.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1897
NIFI-3653: Introduce ManagedAuthorizer
NIFI-3653:
- Introducing UserGroup and Policy provider interfaces.
- Introducing FileUserGroupProvider and FileAccessPolicyProvider.
- Refactoring
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1893
NIFI-4027: Restoring tooltips in the toolbar
NIFI-4027:
- Fixing the positioning of the tooltips in the component toolbar.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
@trixpan I think the most recent commit does address the remaining spots,
however it appears break a unit test. Do you mind updating? Looking at the
failure in the Travis build, I believe the new
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
@trixpan I believe there a couple other instances where we are evaluating
an expression where we are still just catching ProcessException. Specifically,
I believe we also need this adjustment when
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
@markap14 - Counters are currently protected in access policies using a
global resource. This is due to the fact that there are instance based Counters
and a corresponding type based Counter
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1871
NIFI-3719: Address timezone issue when formatting hours/minutes/seconds
NIFI-3719:
- Removing the usage of SimpleDateFormat when formatting
hours/minutes/seconds as the current timezone could
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1848
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1849
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1848
@scottyaslan Would it be possible to update this PR to not take a
percentage based approach? The component(s) selected by the combo plugin can
have any width. Taking a percentage based approach may
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1848
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
Pretty sure it still needs an update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1844
NIFI-3955: Filtering out the EventTime searchable field for all
implementation of ProvenanceRepository
NIFI-3955:
- Filtering out the EventTime searchable field for all implementation
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1838
NIFI-3933: Monitor heartbeats based on connected nodes
NIFI-3933:
- When monitoring heartbeats use the connected nodes as the basis for the
check. This addresses the case when a node
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1812
Thanks @jtstorck. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1812
Will pick up review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1799
Thanks @trixpan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1799
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1819
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master. And thanks @kevdoran
reviewing too!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1819
Will review/merge...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1818
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1818
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1817
Thanks @markap14. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1817
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1808
Thanks @bbende. This looks good and has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1808
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1803
NIFI-3901: Address Provenance Rest Api issues
NIFI-3901:
- Addressing response code of POST /provenance/lineage.
- Ensuring cluster node details are set accordingly.
You can merge this pull
501 - 600 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
