Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872#discussion_r127741006
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/FlowController.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
@markap14 this sounds like a good approach. Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1995
Thanks @markap14. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2001
Thanks @jtstorck! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1999
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1996
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1999
Thanks @m-hogue! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1996
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2000
I've updated the fix version on the JIRA so we'll catch it for 2.0.0.
Unfortunately, I cannot close the PR without a commit. Only the person that
created the PR can do so. Do you mind closing
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2000
Thanks for the PR @m-hogue. I almost made this fix myself awhile back and
held off. Technically, this class is part of a domain model for the REST API.
Folks should be able to use this model
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2001
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978#discussion_r125987445
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -464,6 +464,17 @@ Another option for the UserGroupProvider
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978#discussion_r125994624
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -464,6 +464,17 @@ Another option for the UserGroupProvider
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1962
Thanks @pvillard31! Most recent update looks great. This has been merged to
master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978
@pvillard31 A second commit has been pushed updating the documentation and
providing an example of the composite configurable user group provider. Thanks
again for the review!
---
If your project
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
NIFI-4032: Managed Ranger Authorizer
NIFI-4032: Managed Ranger Authorizer
- Introducing the ManagedRangerAuthorizer.
- Introducing the AuthorizationAuditor.
- Updating authorization
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2023
@bond- Another commit has been pushed which includes a brief example for
NiFi specific configuration. I am not super familiar with proxy configurations
so if you have any additional suggestions
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
Thanks @trixpan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2023
NIFI-4206: Proxy instructions in Admin Guide
NIFI-4206:
- Updating admin guide to include instructions for running NiFi behind a
proxy.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
Great find @YolandaMDavis! Will address this and update. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1980
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1978
NIFI-4127: Composite User Group Providers
NIFI-4127:
- Introducing composite ConfigurableUserGroupProvider and UserGroupProvider.
- Adding appropriate unit tests.
- Updating object model
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
Thanks @markap14! The update has addressed the test failures and this has
been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1980
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1979
@markap14 Looks like the proposed changes are causing unit test failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1962
@pvillard31 Just started reviewing this PR. I'm wondering if the property
should be associated with the cluster section instead of the web properties.
This property is only relevant when clustered
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
@YolandaMDavis Code changes look good. However, one thing I noticed is that
the error provided when the specified proxied user lacks sufficient permissions
could be made a little more user-friendly
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697#discussion_r113531250
--- Diff:
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-admin/src/main/groovy/org/apache/nifi/toolkit/admin/nodemanager/NodeManagerTool.groovy
---
@@ -75,6 +77,7 @@ public
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
@YolandaMDavis I've added another commit [1] to print the response body
when possible. If your happy with this addition, I'll amend it to your PR.
Thanks.
[1]
https://github.com/mcgilman
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
+1 as well. Thanks @YolandaMDavis. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047
@alopresto This is not something that was introduced in this PR though I am
happy to address it here. Will push a new commit shortly. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130878563
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/AccessResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130882716
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130878806
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130884930
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130879118
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc/OidcService.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2047#discussion_r130943341
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/security/oidc
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131979744
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131999511
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131998273
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131985592
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/dao/impl/StandardProcessGroupDAO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131979395
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/ProcessGroupDTO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r132005935
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983043
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131978526
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/VariableRegistryDTO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131997868
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131993623
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/FlowResource.java
---
@@ -640,7
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131985519
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/dao/impl/StandardProcessGroupDAO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131998712
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131994112
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/FlowResource.java
---
@@ -640,7
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131996939
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983295
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983144
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131997934
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r131983689
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/StandardNiFiServiceFacade.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r132257748
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/ProcessGroupResource.java
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r132257197
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/ProcessGroupDTO.java
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
Thanks @alopresto! This has been merged to master. I accidentally forgot to
add the 'This closes...' text to the commit message. Would you mind closing
this PR out? Thanks!
---
If your project
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/3
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2044
@alopresto These refactorings look good. The backward compatibility support
for legacy configurations is also solid. One minor thing I'd like to
investigate further if we can remove the dependency
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2087
@markap14 It appears the changes introduced are causing some test failures.
```
Failed tests:
TestStandardControllerServiceProvider.validateEnableServices:506 null
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/5#discussion_r134531054
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/util/StringUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/5
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2087
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1739
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1739
Thanks @bbende! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1740
NIFI-3782: Controller Service duplicated during Copy/Paste
- Ensuring referenced Controller Services are not included in copy/paste
requests when the Processor is located in a sub group.
You can
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1726
Thanks @YolandaMDavis. Verified new capabilities and existing functions of
the node-manager tool. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Thanks @trixpan! This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1784
NIFI-3853: Filtering out control characters
NIFI-3853:
- Filtering out certain control characters and unpaired Unicode surrogate
codepoints prior to saving the flow.xml.
You can merge
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Yes that was a typo. Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718
Ok sounds good. Let's proceed with this PR and then we can file another
JIRA for the UI work.
I just started reviewing and noticed that the `DocumentTypeDTO` is missing
the deprecation flag
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1780
NIFI-3865: Fix issues viewing content when clustered
NIFI-3865:
- Obtaining the appropriate input stream after accessing content. The
stream was being consumed into a buffer and was not longer
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1817
Thanks @markap14. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1818
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1818
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1801
NIFI-3868: Bulletin Merging Issue
NIFI-3868:
- Ensuring we do not attempt to group bulletins that lack permissions.
- Only group bulletins when all nodes report the same message
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1819
Will review/merge...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1819
Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master. And thanks @kevdoran
reviewing too!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1799
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1799
Thanks @trixpan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1812
Thanks @jtstorck. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1812
Will pick up review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1803
NIFI-3901: Address Provenance Rest Api issues
NIFI-3901:
- Addressing response code of POST /provenance/lineage.
- Ensuring cluster node details are set accordingly.
You can merge this pull
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1808
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1817
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1785
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1718#discussion_r116357519
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/annotation/documentation/DeprecationNotice.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1781
NIFI-3837: Being more specific with escaping of back references in
ReplaceText
NIFI-3837:
- Being more specific regarding the escaping of back references in
evaluated expressions.
You can
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1838
NIFI-3933: Monitor heartbeats based on connected nodes
NIFI-3933:
- When monitoring heartbeats use the connected nodes as the basis for the
check. This addresses the case when a node
GitHub user mcgilman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1844
NIFI-3955: Filtering out the EventTime searchable field for all
implementation of ProvenanceRepository
NIFI-3955:
- Filtering out the EventTime searchable field for all implementation
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1848
Will review...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1644
Pretty sure it still needs an update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1849
Thanks @scottyaslan. This has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1848
@scottyaslan Would it be possible to update this PR to not take a
percentage based approach? The component(s) selected by the combo plugin can
have any width. Taking a percentage based approach may
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1808
Thanks @bbende. This looks good and has been merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1872
@markap14 - Counters are currently protected in access policies using a
global resource. This is due to the fact that there are instance based Counters
and a corresponding type based Counter
501 - 600 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
