Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
Thanks, I updated the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
@pvillard31 @mattyb149 is right...if there are no uses in 1.x (and there
should not be) then it can be removed in this PR too. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
@pvillard31 It might be in the 0.x branch but I wouldn't expect it in
master since that's on Java 8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
@markap14, I agree. One question though: I was going to update
``nifi.jvm.permgen.mb`` as well but I didn't find any occurrence of this
property. Should it be removed or did I miss it?
---
If you
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
@pvillard31 I have no issues with the idea you're proposing here. I would
suggest, though, that we should use properties like
512m instead of
512. There's no need to enforce
that the units be in MB
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1382
will review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
