[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2018-01-11 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread frett27
Github user frett27 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145189535
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

and if you also tests it , it's OK


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread frett27
Github user frett27 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145189423
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

OK let's change that to MapRecord, i'm sure it's reliable, because we use 
it on dev plateform, for the "instanceof Map" you suggest i'm not sure of the 
impact. 


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145185287
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

I can post my flow and sample Avro file if you'd like to see what I mean


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145185126
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

I have the following schema in my test flow: 
`{
 "type": "record",
 "name": "A","fields": [
   {"name": "a", "type": "string"},
   {"name": "c", "type": [ "null", {"type" : "map","values" : "string"} ] } 
 ]
}`

When I debug through the processor to AvroTypeUtil, I get a MapRecord as 
the type of "value", not Map. If it could be either, we could just check for 
either?


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread frett27
Github user frett27 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145175950
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/AvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -691,6 +697,10 @@ private static boolean isCompatibleDataType(final 
Object value, final DataType d
 return true;
 }
 break;
+case MAP:
+if (value instanceof Map) {
--- End diff --

in debugging initially, the given value was MapRecord, 


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread frett27
Github user frett27 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145175558
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

my uderstanding was that the map presence cause the issue in union type,
 whether or not, the map is filled, (instance of map will be returned)


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread frett27
Github user frett27 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145175249
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/AvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -691,6 +697,10 @@ private static boolean isCompatibleDataType(final 
Object value, final DataType d
 return true;
 }
 break;
+case MAP:
+if (value instanceof Map) {
--- End diff --

The MapRecord was my initial post, you suggested to open to Map , type. 
the probleme was when the map is present in the union ("null", "record").


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145169320
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

Also it could check the records to make sure the field values are what you 
expect (null vs not-null, e.g.)


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145169617
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/AvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -691,6 +697,10 @@ private static boolean isCompatibleDataType(final 
Object value, final DataType d
 return true;
 }
 break;
+case MAP:
+if (value instanceof Map) {
--- End diff --

What kind of flow (which processors, e.g.) did you use to test this with? 
When I use ConvertRecord, value is a MapRecord not a Map, which causes this not 
to work. Perhaps we should check for both here?


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-17 Thread mattyb149
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207#discussion_r145169184
  
--- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-record-utils/nifi-avro-record-utils/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/avro/TestAvroTypeUtil.java
 ---
@@ -239,4 +243,20 @@ public void testComplicatedRecursiveSchema() {
 Assert.assertEquals(recordASchema, 
((RecordDataType)recordBParentField.get().getDataType()).getChildSchema());
 }
 
+@Test
+public void testMapWithNullSchema() throws IOException {
+
+Schema recursiveSchema = new 
Schema.Parser().parse(getClass().getResourceAsStream("schema.json"));
+
+// Make sure the following doesn't throw an exception
+RecordSchema recordASchema = 
AvroTypeUtil.createSchema(recursiveSchema.getTypes().get(0));
+
+// check the fix with the proper file
+try(DataFileStream r = new 
DataFileStream<>(getClass().getResourceAsStream("data.avro"),
--- End diff --

Can you explain more about what's going on here, including what is in the 
data.avro file? When I run avro-tools tojson on it, I get the following:

```
java -jar avro-tools-1.8.1.jar tojson datasets/data.avro
{"a.A":{"o":{"a.O":{"hash":{"map":{}}
```

Perhaps it would be good to have a test file that has a record with a 
non-null value for hash, as well as a record with a null value for hash?


---


[GitHub] nifi pull request #2207: NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

2017-10-11 Thread frett27
GitHub user frett27 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207

NIFI-4441 patch avro maps in union types

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

### For all changes:
- [x ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
 in the commit message?

- [x ] Does your PR title start with NIFI- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.

- [ x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?

- [x ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

### For code changes:
- [ x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
- [x ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [x ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
- [x ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

### For documentation related changes:
- [x ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?

### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/frett27/nifi nifi-4441

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2207.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2207


commit 30b3596ac351405ea33d09b9737cece257d8ff54
Author: Patrice Freydiere 
Date:   2017-10-11T20:17:15Z

patch avro maps in union types




---