[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15506704#comment-15506704 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-2790: --- Commit c2e98f96ebe30a6a8c919ed8a747a5829f5dea0f in nifi's branch refs/heads/0.x from [~ozhurakousky] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=c2e98f9 ] NIFI-2789, NIFI-2790 - polishing > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Joey Frazee >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15506702#comment-15506702 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-2790: --- Commit 58fdfdc76e2e59bffbbcdd4e96ad2a190b412b29 in nifi's branch refs/heads/0.x from [~jfrazee] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=58fdfdc ] NIFI-2789, NIFI-2790 - Read JMS properties and add to FlowFile attributes in ConsumeJMS Remove unused assertEquals import Move destination from default to send/receive to support EL better > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Joey Frazee >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15506541#comment-15506541 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-2790: --- Commit c23867605857f8380140ba4d69437b58585e9cba in nifi's branch refs/heads/master from [~jfrazee] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=c238676 ] NIFI-2789, NIFI-2790 - Read JMS properties and add to FlowFile attributes in ConsumeJMS Remove unused assertEquals import Move destination from default to send/receive to support EL better > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Joey Frazee >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15506545#comment-15506545 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2790: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1027 > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Joey Frazee >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15504784#comment-15504784 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2790: -- Github user olegz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1027 Reviewing. . . > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Oleg Zhurakousky >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2790) Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15503839#comment-15503839 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2790: -- GitHub user jfrazee opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1027 NIFI-2790 Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default destination Note: This was branched off of NIFI-2789 / #1026. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jfrazee/nifi NIFI-2790 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1027.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1027 commit d59b4338a838dff88c66ff86ea377071cf981765 Author: Joey FrazeeDate: 2016-09-19T13:18:30Z Read JMS properties and add to FlowFile attributes in ConsumeJMS commit 621fec64bd6ffbe7aefffcfd005421a6515c8ff2 Author: Joey Frazee Date: 2016-09-19T14:49:07Z Remove unused assertEquals import commit 1c76e22b06bd999496e19cd05d08db50660c1652 Author: Joey Frazee Date: 2016-09-19T15:50:59Z Move destination from default to send/receive to support EL better > Set JMS destination name on send/receive instead of using the default > destination > - > > Key: NIFI-2790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2790 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Joey Frazee >Assignee: Oleg Zhurakousky >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS currently pull their destination name from the > default JMS destination (setDefaultDestinationName() on the JmsTemplate). The > effect this has is that attribute expressions are evaluated with respect to > the context only and not the FlowFile, so expression language support really > only extends to EL functions and variables from the variable registry. > This doesn't have a big impact on ConsumeJMS since it doesn't take input, but > it means that destinations can be set at runtime in PublishJMS. > The JmsTemplate send() and receive() can take the destination name as an > argument though, so these method variants should be used so EL support is > fully enabled. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)