[Issue 127418] Windows Installer is unsigned
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127418 --- Comment #4 from Kyle H--- Realistically, there's a few issues here. (I understand that this is probably not the best place to describe it, but I'm bringing a couple of threads together here for this analysis.) Signing the MSI and installer EXE is the simplest part of this. They would need to be submitted to Symantec's signing infrastructure, and utilize credits to do so. (You can test it by using signtool.exe, from the Windows SDK, with a self-signed certificate generated by certtool.exe. But the signature verifiable with the self-signed certificate won't mean anything, other than "these things can be signed".) But ideally, the issue doesn't end there. The freeware source code/text editor Notepad++ had to push a release fairly recently because one of the CIA tool disclosures referred to a persistent implant enabled not because of unsigned DLLs, but because the signatures on the DLLs weren't checked. See https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/notepad-7.3.3-fix-cia-hacking-issue.html for details. Note: I'm not saying that OpenOffice has been hacked. I'm saying that it would be incredibly easy to hack in the same manner, and if it's used for general-purpose office tasks it eventually will be targeted. (And even if you trust US CIA, there's all sorts of other actors -- not limited to state-level adversaries, but also to any criminal who has or can hire the expertise -- who can do so.) So, again ideally, it would be good if on Windows all of the DLLs and everything that could be digitally signed (which you can determine by using signtool.exe on every artifact that OpenOffice includes in its installer) had its signature checked before it were loaded. This would take a LOT more credits in Symantec's infrastructure, and I don't know if Apache would consider it to be worth it. It would also be awesome if it could be done on MacOSX, but I do understand that there may be other (legal department) reasons why it can't necessarily be done as easily there. And I don't know of any digital signature standard for binaries or dynamic shared objects on Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127422] status bar shows object size in inches instead of centimeters
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127422 --- Comment #8 from ka...@spaml.de --- Ah, ok, now I see what you mean. I had to deselect the object and reselect it to have the status bar being updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127422] status bar shows object size in inches instead of centimeters
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127422 --- Comment #7 from ka...@spaml.de --- I am sorry. Either I haven't understood, or my installation behaves different. If I make a right click on the diagram and then click on "object" the object dialog pops up. The measure units in the object dialog are shown in centimeters. If I click on "cancle" or on "ok" in both cases the status bar doesn't change and still shows 1.97 x 1.97- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 108229] Date/Time functions do not work with parameters
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=108229 Jeff Klopoticchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@klopotic.com --- Comment #12 from Jeff Klopotic --- Comment on attachment 67513 --> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=67513 document to reproduce the bug case This appears the same problem in different terms from my experience - date/time functions can't work with date/time strings that have auto-appended apostrophes - and this happens when date/time strings are copy-pasted into Calc. Trying to bulk edit them out is not possible due to an additional bug that causes mangling of the string when trying to do a simple global replace of "'" for "". Hand editing of strings in Calc does fix the problem, which appears to be an auto-correct adding of an "'" to the date/time string upon pasting. Can this be fixed by a simple setting change? Any help appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 86600] Writer and Calc crash opening files - related to Linguistic.xcu
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=86600 Keith N. McKennachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@apache.org Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Keith N. McKenna --- s there has been no communication from op in over 9 years I am closing this as obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 86600] Writer and Calc crash opening files - related to Linguistic.xcu
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=86600 Keith N. McKennachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 86600] Writer and Calc crash opening files - related to Linguistic.xcu
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=86600 robert winshallchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||afw...@sbcglobal.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127420] Writer crash when an User Field that is used in a document is deleted
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127420 oooforum (fr)changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |IRREPRODUCIBLE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||ooofo...@free.fr --- Comment #3 from oooforum (fr) --- I was not able to reproduce with Windows 7 x64 Pro. Step 7, you mentions insert "hello" field. So, you can't have red-cross enabled until this field is in your document. If I remove it, I can remove field into dialogbox too. But no crash occurs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127420] Writer crash when an User Field that is used in a document is deleted
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127420 --- Comment #2 from josekiller--- 17.Repeat the step 4 with another name and value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127420] Writer crash when an User Field that is used in a document is deleted
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127420 josekillerchanged: What|Removed |Added Severity|Trivial |Normal Summary|A User Field that is used |Writer crash when an User |in a document can be|Field that is used in a |deleted using another User |document is deleted |Field. | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127418] Windows Installer is unsigned
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127418 --- Comment #3 from oooforum (fr)--- Old debate: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201412.mbox/%3C006901d01357%24e77c4d30%24b674e790%24%40acm.org%3E If you are interested to do it: your involve is welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127419] Cutting and pasting from the web causes openoffice Writer exception
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127419 oooforum (fr)changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |IRREPRODUCIBLE --- Comment #2 from oooforum (fr) --- Remember that Windows Vista is end-of-life. This kind of problem occurs when insufficient memory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 127419] Cutting and pasting from the web causes openoffice Writer exception
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127419 oooforum (fr)changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ooofo...@free.fr --- Comment #1 from oooforum (fr) --- Created attachment 86109 --> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86109=edit No problem I was not able to reproduce. Download your document and save as: no crash. See screenshot attached. This document is weird: - an object OLE in front with a Writer document. - many pictures linked with an https website: cdn0.vox-cdn.com The best way to embed content from internet is to use a special paste. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue.