[GitHub] [openwhisk-wskdeploy] style95 commented on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key
style95 commented on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-wskdeploy/pull/1092#issuecomment-604176542 @mrutkows Thank you for the good comment. I would update it accordingly. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment
kamyker commented on issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/35#issuecomment-604151434 Or not, settings any timeout also using command line makes it broken. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker opened a new issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment
kamyker opened a new issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/35 On 3.1, it's working fine on old 2.2 that ibm is using by default. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker closed issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment
kamyker closed issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/35 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment
kamyker commented on issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/35#issuecomment-604142682 Seems like timeout setter on ibm website is broken and instead of 40 sec it did 40ms. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker opened a new issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment
kamyker opened a new issue #35: 150kb+ json request crashes whole deployment URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/35 On 3.1, it's working fine on old 2.2 that ibm is using by default. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-wskdeploy] mrutkows edited a comment on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key
mrutkows edited a comment on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-wskdeploy/pull/1092#issuecomment-604126519 @style95 There is historical context for this web-export being added at a higher level than annotations... that is, we had intended that wskdeploy manifests would not allow/expose annotations period (at all). However, we were forced by some use cases to add support for it. My concern is that the code SHOULD still permit the web-export key outside annotations (that is still work and not break anyone using it for 3 years), but deprecate it. Then update all examples use cases to use the annotations, but preserve at least one functional test to make sure that, although deprecated, it still works. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-wskdeploy] mrutkows commented on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key
mrutkows commented on issue #1092: Remove misleading web-export key URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-wskdeploy/pull/1092#issuecomment-604126519 There is historical context for this web-export being added at a higher level than annotations... that is, we had intended that wskdeploy manifests would not allow/expose annotations period (at all). However, we were forced by some use cases to add support for it. My concern is that the code SHOULD still permit the web-export key outside annotations (that is still work and not break anyone using it for 3 years), but deprecate it. Then update all examples use cases to use the annotations, but preserve at least one functional test to make sure that, although deprecated, it still works. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-604105063 > In general the downside of this approach is breaking the openwhisk json in/json out abstraction. I've noticed in IBM console there's "Raw HTTP handling - When enabled your Action receives requests in plain text instead of a JSON body". I guess it doesn't do anything currently in net, right? That's kind of what I'd like to see being implemented. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/docs/webactions.md#raw-http-handling This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-604105063 > In general the downside of this approach is breaking the openwhisk json in/json out abstraction. I've noticed in IBM console there's "Raw HTTP handling - When enabled your Action receives requests in plain text instead of a JSON body". I guess it doesn't do anything currently, right? That's kind of what I'd like to see being implemented. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/docs/webactions.md#raw-http-handling This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker edited a comment on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-604105063 > In general the downside of this approach is breaking the openwhisk json in/json out abstraction. I've noticed in IBM console there's "Raw HTTP handling - When enabled your Action receives requests in plain text instead of a JSON body" I guess it doesn't do anything currently, right? That's kind of what I'd like to see being implemented. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/docs/webactions.md#raw-http-handling This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-604105063 > In general the downside of this approach is breaking the openwhisk json in/json out abstraction. I've noticed in IBM console there's "Raw HTTP handling - When enabled your Action receives requests in plain text instead of a JSON body" I guess it doesn't do anything currently, right? That's kind of what I'd like to see being implemented. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/docs/webactions.md#raw-http-handling This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #34: Running 3.1 on IBM
rabbah commented on issue #34: Running 3.1 on IBM URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/34#issuecomment-604096105 That's right. You can even push your own images with your own dependencies and use them as "docker actions". The main difference is performance. The platform built-in images will load faster whereas the docker actions will have occasional slow starts because the image is pulled. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] rabbah commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error
rabbah commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4866#issuecomment-604095205 currently there is only one zip file which contains the code and dependencies. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] rabbah closed issue #4866: Cannot find module Error
rabbah closed issue #4866: Cannot find module Error URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4866 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker opened a new issue #34: Running 3.1 on IBM
kamyker opened a new issue #34: Running 3.1 on IBM
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/34
You’d need to ask ibm :)
As an Apache project we’d love the contribution, which you could then build
and push to dockerhub and use independent of the ibm lifecycle.
_Originally posted by @rabbah in
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/22#issuecomment-556197318_
Didn't know it was possible but 3.1 image from docker works fine with ibm
functions.
Instead of:
```
ibmcloud fn action update {methodName} out.zip --kind dotnet:2.2 --main
{namespaceName}::{namespaceName}.{className}::{methodName} --web true
```
Simply run:
```
ibmcloud fn action update {methodName} out.zip --docker
openwhisk/action-dotnet-v3.1 --main
{namespaceName}::{namespaceName}.{className}::{methodName} --web true
```
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] beraybentesen commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error
beraybentesen commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4866#issuecomment-603986260 @rabbah You're right. I fixed with the correct configuration. And quick question, is there a way to update action without uploading zip again ? Let's say you just need to update the code itself instead of dependencies etc. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] rabbah commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error
rabbah commented on issue #4866: Cannot find module Error URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4866#issuecomment-603984859 hi @beraybentesen - this isn't very helpful/actionable. Usually this error means your function isn't package properly (your zip file is empty or missing index.js, package.json or similar). You'll need to share more details so someone can help you. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] beraybentesen opened a new issue #4866: Cannot find module Error
beraybentesen opened a new issue #4866: Cannot find module Error URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4866 After successfully deploying with zip file receiving this when I invoke action : "error": "Error: Cannot find module '/nodejsAction/nrx2Fj84'\nat Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:582:15)\n at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:508:25)\nat Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:637:17)\nat require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:22:18)\nat eval (eval at (/nodejsAction/runner.js:55:49), :1:1)\nat /nodejsAction/runner.js:55:49\nat process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)" } This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
