[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-97) Leader may not have majority after setConfiguration

2017-08-10 Thread Jing Zhao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16122880#comment-16122880 ] Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-97: +1. I will commit the patch shortly. > Leader may not have majority after

[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-97) Leader may not have majority after setConfiguration

2017-08-04 Thread Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16114789#comment-16114789 ] Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-97: -- > Therefore I think the {{reinitialize}} API should

[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-97) Leader may not have majority after setConfiguration

2017-08-04 Thread Jing Zhao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16114062#comment-16114062 ] Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-97: Thanks for the patch, Nicholas! Looks like we may have two scenarios here:

[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-97) Leader may not have majority after setConfiguration

2017-07-28 Thread Jing Zhao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16105563#comment-16105563 ] Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-97: bq. Currently, we just start new servers with one configuration. I guess

[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-97) Leader may not have majority after setConfiguration

2017-07-27 Thread Jing Zhao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16104207#comment-16104207 ] Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-97: Not sure whether this can happen. According to the protocol, during