[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14341005#comment-14341005 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5140: --- Wanted to mention, I did manage to get

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-4320) JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14337540#comment-14337540 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-4320: --- Sorry- this ticket should have been closed

[jira] [Closed] (SPARK-4320) JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet closed SPARK-4320. - Resolution: Won't Fix Target Version/s: 1.2.1, 1.1.2 (was: 1.1.2, 1.2.1) JavaPairRDD

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14335518#comment-14335518 ] Corey J. Nolet edited comment on SPARK-5140 at 2/24/15 9:50 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14335518#comment-14335518 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5140: --- I have a framework (similar to cascading)

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14304510#comment-14304510 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5140: --- I think the problem is that when actions

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14304577#comment-14304577 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5260: --- I'm thinking all the schema-specific

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14303548#comment-14303548 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5140: --- Is anyone against this behavior for any

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14288621#comment-14288621 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5260: --- May I be added to the proper list so that I

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-5305) Using a field in a WHERE clause that is not in the schema does not throw an exception.

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-5305: - Summary: Using a field in a WHERE clause that is not in the schema does not throw an exception. Key: SPARK-5305 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5305

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5306) Support for a NotEqualsFilter in the filter PrunedFilteredScan pushdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5306: -- Component/s: SQL Support for a NotEqualsFilter in the filter PrunedFilteredScan pushdown

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-5306) Support for a NotEqualsFilter in the filter PrunedFilteredScan pushdown

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-5306: - Summary: Support for a NotEqualsFilter in the filter PrunedFilteredScan pushdown Key: SPARK-5306 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5306 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5296) Predicate Pushdown (BaseRelation) to have an interface that will accept OR filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281621#comment-14281621 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5296: --- The more I'm thinking about this- It would

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14280802#comment-14280802 ] Corey J. Nolet edited comment on SPARK-5260 at 1/16/15 8:48 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14280802#comment-14280802 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-5260: --- bq. you can make the change and create a

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14280802#comment-14280802 ] Corey J. Nolet edited comment on SPARK-5260 at 1/16/15 8:52 PM:

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-5296) Predicate Pushdown (BaseRelation) to have an interface that will accept OR filters

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-5296: - Summary: Predicate Pushdown (BaseRelation) to have an interface that will accept OR filters Key: SPARK-5296 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5296

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5260) Expose JsonRDD.allKeysWithValueTypes() in a utility class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5260: -- Description: I have found this method extremely useful when implementing my own strategy for

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-5140: - Summary: Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases Key: SPARK-5140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5140: -- Description: Not sure if this would change too much of the internals to be included in the

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5140: -- Description: Not sure if this would change too much of the internals to be included in the

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5140: -- Description: Not sure if this would change too much of the internals to be included in the

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-5140) Two RDDs which are scheduled concurrently should be able to wait on parent in all cases

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-5140: -- Description: Not sure if this would change too much of the internals to be included in the

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-4320) JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14208084#comment-14208084 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-4320: --- Since this is a simple change, I wanted to

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-4320) JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-4320: - Summary: JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object Key: SPARK-4320 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4320

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-4320) JavaPairRDD should supply a saveAsNewHadoopDataset which takes a Job object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corey J. Nolet updated SPARK-4320: -- Description: I am outputting data to Accumulo using a custom OutputFormat. I have tried using

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-4289) Creating an instance of Hadoop Job fails in the Spark shell when toString() is called on the instance.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14203183#comment-14203183 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on SPARK-4289: --- I suppose we could look @ it as a Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-4289) Creating an instance of Hadoop Job fails in the Spark shell when toString() is called on the instance.

Corey J. Nolet created SPARK-4289: - Summary: Creating an instance of Hadoop Job fails in the Spark shell when toString() is called on the instance. Key: SPARK-4289 URL: