[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18006) When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15588258#comment-15588258 ] Shawn Zhang commented on SPARK-18006: - I see, I will close the issue > When union, spark SQL didn't

[jira] [Closed] (SPARK-18006) When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Zhang closed SPARK-18006. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch >

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18006) When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15588221#comment-15588221 ] Shawn Zhang commented on SPARK-18006: - So you mean column name is not part of schema. Two schema are

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-18006) When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15588139#comment-15588139 ] Shawn Zhang commented on SPARK-18006: - ds1.printSchema() shows root |-- dateline: long (nullable =

[jira] [Created] (SPARK-18006) When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch

Shawn Zhang created SPARK-18006: --- Summary: When union, spark SQL didn't complain about schema mismatch Key: SPARK-18006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18006 Project: Spark