[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15494475#comment-15494475 ]
Michael Armbrust edited comment on SPARK-16407 at 9/15/16 8:42 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sure, but the bar for compatibility is different for things in explicit user facing APIs (DataFrame/StreamReader/Writer) than for stuff that involves implementing interfaces defined in packages that are documented as internal ({{org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.\*}}, {{org.apache.spark.sql.execution.\*}}) was (Author: marmbrus): Sure, but the bar for compatibility is different for things in explicit user facing APIs (DataFrame/StreamReader/Writer) than for stuff that involves implementing interfaces defined in packages that are documented as internal (org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.*, org.apache.spark.sql.execution.*) > Allow users to supply custom StreamSinkProviders > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SPARK-16407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Streaming > Reporter: holdenk > > The current DataStreamWriter allows users to specify a class name as format, > however it could be easier for people to directly pass in a specific provider > instance - e.g. for user equivalent of ForeachSink or other sink with > non-string parameters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org