[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15107859#comment-15107859
]
iward commented on SPARK-12864:
---
The important point of the idea is to fix this conflict ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15107812#comment-15107812
]
Mao, Wei commented on SPARK-12864:
--
I don't quite get your point here. With your new exe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15106295#comment-15106295
]
iward commented on SPARK-12864:
---
I don't think so. Why don't fix this conflict executor id
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15106214#comment-15106214
]
Saisai Shao commented on SPARK-12864:
-
So the problem should be that: {{BlockManager}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15106129#comment-15106129
]
iward commented on SPARK-12864:
---
Yeah, you are right. When AM is exited, All executors will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105671#comment-15105671
]
Saisai Shao commented on SPARK-12864:
-
What's Spark version are you using? I remember
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15103715#comment-15103715
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-12864:
--
User 'zhonghaihua' has created a pull reques
