[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17031860#comment-17031860
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-30668:
-
I think this is still not resolved. Spark 3.0 should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028748#comment-17028748
]
Wenchen Fan commented on SPARK-30668:
-
[~maxgekk] can we do them one by one? The Sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028731#comment-17028731
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
Behind of the removed config _spark.sql.legacy.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028709#comment-17028709
]
Wenchen Fan commented on SPARK-30668:
-
I checked the doc in [Spark
2.4|https://gith
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028586#comment-17028586
]
Dongjoon Hyun commented on SPARK-30668:
---
[~maxgekk]. What I meant was the scope of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028545#comment-17028545
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
> as a bug introduced by a new improvement patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028537#comment-17028537
]
Dongjoon Hyun commented on SPARK-30668:
---
Given the current circumstance, this seem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028535#comment-17028535
]
Dongjoon Hyun commented on SPARK-30668:
---
[~maxgekk]. We don't backport improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028533#comment-17028533
]
Dongjoon Hyun commented on SPARK-30668:
---
[~maxgekk]. You should be the last man wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028532#comment-17028532
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
[~dongjoon] I have found the reason
[https://g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028515#comment-17028515
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
[~dongjoon] Output of your example is surprised
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025729#comment-17025729
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
We can try to revert this [https://github.com/a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025698#comment-17025698
]
Herman van Hövell commented on SPARK-30668:
---
I don't think we should revert th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025681#comment-17025681
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
If [~marmbrus] develops something new, he could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025673#comment-17025673
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-30668:
-
[~hvanhovell] Making it configurable looks necessary.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025651#comment-17025651
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
> This is not mentioned in the migration guide.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025644#comment-17025644
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-30668:
-
Can we let users choose different parsing mechanisms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025643#comment-17025643
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-30668:
-
This will make the migration very painful. This is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025549#comment-17025549
]
Maxim Gekk commented on SPARK-30668:
Date/timestamp parsing is based on Java 8 DateT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025467#comment-17025467
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-30668:
-
cc [~maxgekk]
> to_timestamp failed to parse 2020-01
20 matches
Mail list logo