Jeff Min created SPARK-42935:
--------------------------------
Summary: Optimze shuffle for union spark plan
Key: SPARK-42935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-42935
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Jeff Min
Fix For: 3.5.0
Union plan does not take full advantage of children plan output partitionings
when output partitoning can't match parent plan's required distribution. For
example, Table1 and table2 are all bucketed table with bucket column id and
bucket number 100. We will do row_number window function after union the two
tables.
create table table1 (id int, name string) using csv CLUSTERED BY (id) INTO 100
BUCKETS;
insert into table1 values(1, "s1");
insert into table1 values(2, "s2");
create table table2 (id int, name string) using csv CLUSTERED BY (id) INTO 100
BUCKETS;
insert into table2 values(1, "s3");
set spark.sql.shuffle.partitions=100;
explain select *, row_number() over(partition by id order by name desc)
id_row_number from (select * from table1 union all select * from table2);
The physical plan is
AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false
+- Window [row_number() windowspecdefinition(id#35, name#36 DESC NULLS LAST,
specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, unboundedpreceding$(), currentrow$())) AS
id_row_number#28], [id#35], [name#36 DESC NULLS LAST]
+- Sort [id#35 ASC NULLS FIRST, name#36 DESC NULLS LAST], false, 0
+- Exchange hashpartitioning(id#35, 100), ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS,
[plan_id=88]
+- Union
:- FileScan csv spark_catalog.default.table1[id#35,name#36]
+- FileScan csv spark_catalog.default.table2[id#37,name#38]
Although the two tables are bucketed by id column, there's still a exchange
plan after union.The reason is that union plan's output partitioning is null.
We can indroduce a new idea to optimize exchange plan:
# First introduce a new RDD, it consists of parent rdds that has the same
partition size. The ith parttition corresponds to ith partition of each parent
rdd.
# Then push the required distribution to union plan's children. If any child
output partitioning matches the required distribution , we can reduce this
child shuffle operation.
After doing these, the physical plan is
daptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false
+- Window [row_number() windowspecdefinition(id#7, name#8 DESC NULLS LAST,
specifiedwindowframe(RowFrame, unboundedpreceding$(), currentrow$())) AS
id_row_number#0], [id#7], [name#8 DESC NULLS LAST]
+- Sort [id#7 ASC NULLS FIRST, name#8 DESC NULLS LAST], false, 0
+- UnionZip [ClusteredDistribution(ArrayBuffer(id#7),false,None),
ClusteredDistribution(ArrayBuffer(id#9),false,None)], hashpartitioning(id#7,
200)
:- FileScan csv spark_catalog.default.table1[id#7,name#8]
+- FileScan csv spark_catalog.default.table2[id#9,name#10]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
