[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joseph K. Bradley resolved SPARK-7132.
--------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.4.0

Issue resolved by pull request 21129
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21129]

> Add fit with validation set to spark.ml GBT
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-7132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7132
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ML
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Assignee: Weichen Xu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4.0
>
>
> In spark.mllib GradientBoostedTrees, we have a method runWithValidation which 
> takes a validation set.  We should add that to the spark.ml API.
> This will require a bit of thinking about how the Pipelines API should handle 
> a validation set (since Transformers and Estimators only take 1 input 
> DataFrame).  The current plan is to include an extra column in the input 
> DataFrame which indicates whether the row is for training, validation, etc.
> Goals
> A  [P0] Support efficient validation during training
> B  [P1] Support early stopping based on validation metrics
> C  [P0] Ensure validation data are preprocessed identically to training data
> D  [P1] Support complex Pipelines with multiple models using validation data
> Proposal: column with indicator for train vs validation
> Include an extra column in the input DataFrame which indicates whether the 
> row is for training or validation.  Add a Param “validationFlagCol” used to 
> specify the extra column name.
> A, B, C are easy.
> D is doable.
> Each estimator would need to have its validationFlagCol Param set to the same 
> column.
> Complication: It would be ideal if we could prevent different estimators from 
> using different validation sets.  (Joseph: There is not an obvious way IMO.  
> Maybe we can address this later by, e.g., having Pipelines take a 
> validationFlagCol Param and pass that to the sub-models in the Pipeline.  
> Let’s not worry about this for now.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to