zrhoffman commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263985694
Switched back to the old annotations we were using that echoes annotations
instead of using the API (I wish more of them did that) in 7483eaa032
--
This is an automated
github-code-scanning[bot] commented on code in PR #7102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7102#discussion_r984908529
##
experimental/traffic-portal/server.ts:
##
@@ -198,10 +196,18 @@
return;
ocket opened a new pull request, #7102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7102
Fixed the TPv2 server not running as intended.
It also now handles more gracefully the common case of bind permissions
being denied on port 80 when running in SSL mode. Instead of the
ocket commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263932500
So you're saying that once this is merged it'll add annotations?
Lemme check that out. Or, well, at least check if the warning and error go
away.
--
This is an
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263910426
But we can get annotations on PRs. See the annotations generated from the PR
I linked above: https://github.com/apache/unomi/actions/runs/3129456290
--
This is an automated
ocket commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263905693
Well if we can't get annotations on PRs, why have the step for converting
JUnit to annotations?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263899975
> Also it's not caching Maven dependencies because it can't find the
directory at the end of the run:
>
> > Warning: Path Validation Error: Path(s) specified in the action
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263896968
> I'm still seeing the same annotations in the latest run on that
JUnit-to-annotation conversion.
I think that that is because the *mikepenz/action-junit-report* action is
ocket commented on PR #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263853338
I'm still seeing the same annotations in the latest run on that
JUnit-to-annotation conversion.
Also it's not caching Maven dependencies because it can't find the
jhg03a opened a new issue, #7101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/7101
## This Improvement request (usability, performance, tech debt, etc.)
affects these Traffic Control components:
- Traffic Portal
## Current behavior:
Right now when
rimashah25 commented on PR #7075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7075#issuecomment-1263765624
I see the `Last Updated` field in the form correctly
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22248619/193310803-9433129e-cc32-4f19-a5fd-84c6e3cc0654.png)
but in
ocket merged PR #7084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7084
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
zrhoffman opened a new pull request, #7100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100
This Pull Request
* renames the [*Traffic Router Unit
Tests*](https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/actions/workflows/tr.unit.tests.yaml)
workflow to [*Traffic Router
13 matches
Mail list logo