[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] zrhoffman commented on pull request #7100: Traffic Router tests GHA: Include integration tests

2022-09-30 Thread GitBox
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263985694 Switched back to the old annotations we were using that echoes annotations instead of using the API (I wish more of them did that) in 7483eaa032 -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] zrhoffman commented on pull request #7100: Traffic Router tests GHA: Include integration tests

2022-09-30 Thread GitBox
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263910426 But we can get annotations on PRs. See the annotations generated from the PR I linked above: https://github.com/apache/unomi/actions/runs/3129456290 -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] zrhoffman commented on pull request #7100: Traffic Router tests GHA: Include integration tests

2022-09-30 Thread GitBox
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263899975 > Also it's not caching Maven dependencies because it can't find the directory at the end of the run: > > > Warning: Path Validation Error: Path(s) specified in the action

[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] zrhoffman commented on pull request #7100: Traffic Router tests GHA: Include integration tests

2022-09-30 Thread GitBox
zrhoffman commented on PR #7100: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/7100#issuecomment-1263896968 > I'm still seeing the same annotations in the latest run on that JUnit-to-annotation conversion. I think that that is because the *mikepenz/action-junit-report* action is