[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16703990#comment-16703990
]
Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-6194:
---
Ah ok, so we could make this about augmenting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16703905#comment-16703905
]
Lars Volker commented on IMPALA-6194:
-
Are I/O threads the only ones that can get stuck? The idea of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16699646#comment-16699646
]
Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-6194:
---
[~lv][~kwho] is there anything concrete to do here except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16516133#comment-16516133
]
Michael Ho commented on IMPALA-6194:
{{HdfsScanNode::GetNext()}} will get unstuck once there are row
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16516127#comment-16516127
]
Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-6194:
---
I agree that the whole scheme depends on I/O threads not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16516123#comment-16516123
]
Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-6194:
---
[~kwho] I think materialized_row_batches_ should get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16516115#comment-16516115
]
Michael Ho commented on IMPALA-6194:
For the record, adding some major offenders which may ignore
