[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8818) Replace deque queue with spillable queue in BufferedPlanRootSink

2019-09-09 Thread Sahil Takiar (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16926011#comment-16926011 ] Sahil Takiar commented on IMPALA-8818: -- The commit message is wrong, the query options are called

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8818) Replace deque queue with spillable queue in BufferedPlanRootSink

2019-08-23 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16914748#comment-16914748 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on IMPALA-8818: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8818) Replace deque queue with spillable queue in BufferedPlanRootSink

2019-08-01 Thread Sahil Takiar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16898319#comment-16898319 ] Sahil Takiar commented on IMPALA-8818: -- Makes sense. I'm considering adding two query options then:

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8818) Replace deque queue with spillable queue in BufferedPlanRootSink

2019-07-31 Thread Tim Armstrong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16897344#comment-16897344 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8818: --- We haven't used the max reservation for individual plan

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8818) Replace deque queue with spillable queue in BufferedPlanRootSink

2019-07-31 Thread Sahil Takiar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16897333#comment-16897333 ] Sahil Takiar commented on IMPALA-8818: -- CC: [~tarmstr...@cloudera.com], [~kwho] One thing I don't