[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8026) Actual row counts for nested loop join are meaningless

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16734612#comment-16734612 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8026: --- [~Paul.Rogers] you're right, that's all it's doing. The

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8026) Actual row counts for nested loop join are meaningless

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16734354#comment-16734354 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8026: --- Ok, I can reproduce the bug with this query (it could

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8026) Actual row counts for nested loop join are meaningless

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16734320#comment-16734320 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8026: --- The logic for num_rows_returned_ and

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8026) Actual row counts for nested loop join are meaningless

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16734325#comment-16734325 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8026: --- Actually the hash join approach doesn't quite work,

[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8026) Actual row counts for nested loop join are meaningless

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16731462#comment-16731462 ] Tim Armstrong commented on IMPALA-8026: --- [~Paul.Rogers] can you include the full plan or at least