[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1523) Add RelBuilder field() method to reference aliased relations not on top of stack

2016-12-01 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15713734#comment-15713734
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1523:
--

Yes, I think that would be useful. But if we allow null alias names (I don't 
remember) we should continue to allow that.

> Add RelBuilder field() method to reference aliased relations not on top of 
> stack
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1523
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1523
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Jess Balint
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>Priority: Minor
>
> It would be convenient to reference aliased tables that are not on top of the 
> RelBuilder stack.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1523) Add RelBuilder field() method to reference aliased relations not on top of stack

2016-12-01 Thread Jess Balint (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15713502#comment-15713502
 ] 

Jess Balint commented on CALCITE-1523:
--

I don't see anything preventing conflicting alias names. should this be 
validated in the {{Frame}} constructor?

> Add RelBuilder field() method to reference aliased relations not on top of 
> stack
> 
>
> Key: CALCITE-1523
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1523
> Project: Calcite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: core
>Reporter: Jess Balint
>Assignee: Julian Hyde
>Priority: Minor
>
> It would be convenient to reference aliased tables that are not on top of the 
> RelBuilder stack.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)