[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15607438#comment-15607438 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: - Commit 12a062585212b2bcc32afbb43e0b30f7cbba72a4 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=12a0625 ] Merge pull request #1642 from mike-tutkowski/managed_system_vms CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed StorageThis PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage. Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN for a particular virtual disk (making it easier to deliver QoS). For example, with this PR, you'd likely have a single virtual disk for a system VM. On XenServer, that virtual disk resides by itself in a storage repository (no other virtual disks share this storage repository). It was possible in the past to spin up system VMs that used managed storage, but this PR facilitates the use case by making changes to the System Service Offering dialog (and by putting in some parameter checks in the management server). JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 * pr/1642: Added support for system VMs to make use of managed storage Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15607437#comment-15607437 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: - Commit 12a062585212b2bcc32afbb43e0b30f7cbba72a4 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=12a0625 ] Merge pull request #1642 from mike-tutkowski/managed_system_vms CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed StorageThis PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage. Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN for a particular virtual disk (making it easier to deliver QoS). For example, with this PR, you'd likely have a single virtual disk for a system VM. On XenServer, that virtual disk resides by itself in a storage repository (no other virtual disks share this storage repository). It was possible in the past to spin up system VMs that used managed storage, but this PR facilitates the use case by making changes to the System Service Offering dialog (and by putting in some parameter checks in the management server). JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 * pr/1642: Added support for system VMs to make use of managed storage Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15607440#comment-15607440 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15607429#comment-15607429 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 LGTM. The one failing test is due to environment issue, I've fixed it and will send a PR shortly. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15607418#comment-15607418 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 yes. I am merging this now. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15606020#comment-15606020 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd @karuturi I think we are good to go on this PR now. Do you agree? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15605538#comment-15605538 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Trillian test result (tid-178) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 25671 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t178-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 48 look ok, 0 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.50 | test_outofbandmanagement.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 175.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.25 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 255.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 310.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 541.03 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 515.16 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1322.44 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 559.41 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 755.94 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1296.27 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.10 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.42 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.67 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.35 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 45.61 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 735.31 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 268.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.76 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.94 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 90.80 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 40.45 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 131.83 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.88 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.76 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.61 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.84 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 138.72 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.36 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.16 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.26 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 242.72 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.16 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 45.42 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 35.35 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.16 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_04_re
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602365#comment-15602365 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602364#comment-15602364 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan test > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15601984#comment-15601984 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Any way to easily just re-run test_05_stop_ssvm and test_07_reboot_ssvm? I'm not sure how this PR would cause such failures. The only changed Java code does the following: * Validates IOPS parameters in a certain situation when creating a new System Offering. (should not apply here) * For managed storage, when the storage-cleanup thread runs, attempts to remove the remaining SR. If this fails, the exception is logged and processing continues as usual. (should not apply here) > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15601276#comment-15601276 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi @mike-tutkowski the oobm related error was an env issue, the vpc/vr related failures are know (and fixes are on its way). I'm not sure what to make of the ssvm/storage related failures. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15601056#comment-15601056 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan @rhtyd How are we on this PR? are the failures related? Or can I go ahead and merge this? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600694#comment-15600694 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Trillian test result (tid-164) Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 38976 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t164-vmware-55u3.zip Test completed. 44 look ok, 4 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 188.44 | test_privategw_acl.py test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.52 | test_outofbandmanagement.py test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Failure` | 121.17 | test_internal_lb.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 496.76 | test_vpc_vpn.py ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_snapshots.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.82 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 375.66 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 768.11 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 693.88 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1560.40 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 699.93 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 679.90 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1381.37 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 26.03 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 70.62 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.30 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.32 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.84 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 510.29 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 224.32 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 161.33 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.74 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 274.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 5.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 266.78 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.27 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.17 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 130.93 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 261.94 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 233.93 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.68 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.65 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 176.93 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 239.06 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.26 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.60 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 130.05 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600565#comment-15600565 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Trillian test result (tid-162) Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6 Total time taken: 33772 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t162-xenserver-65sp1.zip Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 527.22 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1367.28 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 575.62 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 555.51 | test_privategw_acl.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 336.70 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 141.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 529.06 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 301.29 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 729.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 872.62 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1106.86 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.25 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 81.13 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.11 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 20.42 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.28 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.36 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.80 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 434.13 | test_volumes.py test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.34 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 224.62 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.77 | test_vm_snapshots.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 279.07 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.85 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.43 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 156.38 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.21 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.14 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.20 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 60.65 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.86 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 259.32 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 151.76 | test_ssvm.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 174.39 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.86 | test_ssvm.py test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 139.46 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.15 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.46 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 36.74 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.25 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.26 | test_scale_vm.py test_09_reb
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600414#comment-15600414
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
2016-10-23 19:32:49,315 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: test_05_stop_ssvm:
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\ntestMethod()\n',
' File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 733, in test_05_stop_ssvm\n
self.waitForSystemVMAgent(ssvm_response.name)\n', ' File
"/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 81, in waitForSystemVMAgent\nraise
Exception("Timed out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up")\n', 'Exception: Timed
out waiting for SSVM agent to be Up\n']
2016-10-23 19:41:26,319 - CRITICAL - FAILED: test_07_reboot_ssvm:
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\ntestMethod()\n',
' File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py", line 920, in test_07_reboot_ssvm\n
self.test_03_ssvm_internals()\n', ' File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py",
line 440, in test_03_ssvm_internals\n"Check for warnings in tests"\n', '
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 553, in assertEqual\n
assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)\n', ' File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 546, in _baseAssertEqual\n
raise self.failureException(msg)\n', 'AssertionError: Check for warnings in
tests\n']
Off hand I'm not sure how this PR would cause these failures. Perhaps we
could run these tests again?
> Fully support system VMs on managed storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: All
>Reporter: Mike Tutkowski
>Assignee: Mike Tutkowski
> Fix For: 4.10.0.0
>
>
> There are three related items for this ticket:
> 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering
> (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in).
> 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs
> were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems
> (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them.
> 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600412#comment-15600412
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
==
FAIL: Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 582, in
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL
self.do_vpc_test(False)
File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 727, in do_vpc_test
self.check_ssh_into_vm(vm.get_vm(), vm.get_ip(), expectFail=expectFail,
retries=retries)
File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 571, in
check_ssh_into_vm
self.fail("Failed to SSH into VM - %s" %
(public_ip.ipaddress.ipaddress))
AssertionError: Failed to SSH into VM - 10.1.34.104
That might be a problem with the test.
> Fully support system VMs on managed storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: All
>Reporter: Mike Tutkowski
>Assignee: Mike Tutkowski
> Fix For: 4.10.0.0
>
>
> There are three related items for this ticket:
> 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering
> (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in).
> 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs
> were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems
> (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them.
> 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600409#comment-15600409 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Tests out-of-band management change password feature ... === TestName: test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : FAILED === FAIL That might be a problem with the test. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600395#comment-15600395 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Trillian test result (tid-163) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 25326 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1642-t163-kvm-centos7.zip Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s) Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 367.82 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_07_reboot_ssvm | `Failure` | 355.37 | test_ssvm.py test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.30 | test_outofbandmanagement.py test_05_stop_ssvm | `Error` | 370.57 | test_ssvm.py test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.16 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 55.75 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 224.90 | test_vpc_vpn.py test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 263.39 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 565.10 | test_vpc_router_nics.py test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 524.24 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1319.89 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | Success | 557.64 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 800.81 | test_vpc_redundant.py test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.40 | test_volumes.py test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.34 | test_volumes.py test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.22 | test_volumes.py test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.22 | test_volumes.py test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.15 | test_volumes.py test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.20 | test_volumes.py test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.71 | test_volumes.py test_01_create_volume | Success | 750.46 | test_volumes.py test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 292.63 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.01 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.38 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.57 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.72 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 135.73 | test_templates.py test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.07 | test_templates.py test_01_create_template | Success | 40.32 | test_templates.py test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 136.34 | test_ssvm.py test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.42 | test_ssvm.py test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.78 | test_ssvm.py test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 161.63 | test_ssvm.py test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.28 | test_ssvm.py test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.89 | test_ssvm.py test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_ssvm.py test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.89 | test_snapshots.py test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.47 | test_service_offerings.py test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.02 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py test_09_reboot_router | Success | 55.43 | test_routers.py test_08_start_router | Success | 25.20 | test_routers.py test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.11 | test_routers.py test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.02 | test_routers.py test_0
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15599834#comment-15599834 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15599833#comment-15599833 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan test matrix > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15597946#comment-15597946 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Looks like re-pushing the commit did the trick, @rhtyd. I think we are good to go here. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15596548#comment-15596548 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd I changed the SHA and re-pushed the commit. Hopefully that will clear up Travis. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15594443#comment-15594443 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-79 > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15594120#comment-15594120 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15594093#comment-15594093 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 LGTM. @mike-tutkowski can you check why Travis failed? @blueorangutan package > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15554294#comment-15554294 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user koushik-das commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @mike-tutkowski If the LGTMs are there, this can get merged. There are lot of comments so difficult to go through all of them. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15549301#comment-15549301 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Just following up on this one. Is there any pending work item that remains or are we able to merge? Thanks! > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543669#comment-15543669 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell Excellent...closing and re-opening the ticket fixed the CI issue. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543236#comment-15543236 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Closing and re-opening the PR fixed the Travis issue. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543134#comment-15543134 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543135#comment-15543135 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: GitHub user mike-tutkowski reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage This PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage. Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN for a particular virtual disk (making it easier to deliver QoS). For example, with this PR, you'd likely have a single virtual disk for a system VM. On XenServer, that virtual disk resides by itself in a storage repository (no other virtual disks share this storage repository). It was possible in the past to spin up system VMs that used managed storage, but this PR facilitates the use case by making changes to the System Service Offering dialog (and by putting in some parameter checks in the management server). JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack managed_system_vms Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1642 > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543136#comment-15543136 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 I still got a weird Travis failure, so I decided to close and re-open this PR. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543025#comment-15543025 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Travis, which was failing for a similar reason for #1600, passed, so I will (once again) change the commit SHA and re-push. In fact, while I'm at it, I'll rebase it against the latest from master before re-pushing. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543006#comment-15543006
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell @mike-tutkowski looks like marvin fails to get installed
properly, one of the dependency fails with following:
Command "/opt/python/2.7.10/bin/python2.7 -u -c "import setuptools,
tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/setup.py';exec(compile(getattr(tokenize,
'open', open)(__file__).read().replace('\r\n', '\n'), __file__, 'exec'))"
install --record /tmp/pip-ELOxnP-record/install-record.txt
--single-version-externally-managed --compile --user --prefix=" failed with
error code 1 in /tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/
Feel free to try to fix it, else I'll open a new PR and see if it works
with latest 4.9 and master branches, and fix anything necessary tomorrow. I'll
keep you posted.
> Fully support system VMs on managed storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: All
>Reporter: Mike Tutkowski
>Assignee: Mike Tutkowski
> Fix For: 4.10.0.0
>
>
> There are three related items for this ticket:
> 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering
> (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in).
> 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs
> were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems
> (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them.
> 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542438#comment-15542438 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @rhtyd any ideas? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542434#comment-15542434 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell I think it's Travis. I've changed the commit SHA twice now and it failed both times plus it fails with #1600, as well (even though I pushed that one multiple times, too). Not sure why it can't find nosetests. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542428#comment-15542428
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504:
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski The Travis build is failing with the following error:
```
0.04s$ ./tools/travis/script.sh ${TESTS}
Running tests: smoke/test_usage_events smoke/test_vm_life_cycle
smoke/test_vm_snapshots smoke/test_volumes smoke/test_vpc_redundant
smoke/test_vpc_router_nics smoke/test_vpc_vpn smoke/misc/test_deploy_vm
smoke/misc/test_vm_ha smoke/misc/test_escalations_templates
smoke/misc/test_vm_sync
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./tools/travis/xunit-reader.py", line 27, in
import texttable
ImportError: No module named texttable
```
I don't know if that is due to a change in the PR or Travis just need to be
re-kicked.
> Fully support system VMs on managed storage
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: All
>Reporter: Mike Tutkowski
>Assignee: Mike Tutkowski
> Fix For: 4.10.0.0
>
>
> There are three related items for this ticket:
> 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering
> (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in).
> 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs
> were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems
> (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them.
> 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15542424#comment-15542424 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Travis issue? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15527984#comment-15527984 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi awaiting feature enhancement to blueorangutan which was delayed due to an medical emergency. Also, I want to wait to perform further testing until #1692 is tested and merged as it fixes a number of smoke test errors. Tests for it are running now, and I expect it to be merged tomorrow (28 Sept 2016). I apologize for the wait. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15525662#comment-15525662 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan @jburwell any update on the tests? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15515359#comment-15515359 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Thanks for running that, @serg38! > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15514349#comment-15514349 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 LGTM testing on Vmware hardware. RHEL 6 management servers, ESX 5.5 and 6 hypervisors, advanced networking ``` test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName: test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Status : SUCCESS === test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups ... === TestName: test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Status : SUCCESS === Test Deploy Virtual Machine from ISO ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Status : SUCCESS === Test deploy virtual machine with root resize ... === TestName: test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : SUCCESS === Test proper failure to deploy virtual machine with rootdisksize of 0 ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : SUCCESS === Test proper failure to deploy virtual machine with rootdisksize less than template size ... === TestName: test_02_deploy_vm_root_resize | Status : SUCCESS === Test to deploy vm with a first fit offering ... === TestName: test_deployvm_firstfit | Status : SUCCESS === Test deploy VMs using user concentrated planner ... === TestName: test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Status : SUCCESS === Test deploy VMs using user dispersion planner ... === TestName: test_deployvm_userdispersing | Status : SUCCESS === Test userdata as GET, size > 2k ... === TestName: test_deployvm_userdata | Status : SUCCESS === Test userdata as POST, size > 2k ... === TestName: test_deployvm_userdata_post | Status : SUCCESS === Test to create disk offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS === Test to create a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: test_02_create_sparse_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS === Test to create a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS === Test to update existing disk offering ... === TestName: test_02_edit_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS === Test to delete disk offering ... === TestName: test_03_delete_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS === Test to ensure 4 default roles cannot be deleted ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Test to check role, role permissions and account life cycles ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Test for role-rule enforcement in case of multiple mgmt servers ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Test to ensure role in use cannot be deleted ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests normal lifecycle operations for roles ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests role update ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests that default four roles exist ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests role update ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests role update when role is in use by an account ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests concurrent order updation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests creation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests deletion of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests listing of default role's permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test Tests order updation of role permission ... SKIP: Dynamic Role-Based API checker not enabled, skipping test test update configuration setting at zone level scope ... === TestName: test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Status : SUCCESS === Test guest vlan range dedication ... === TestName: test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Status : SUCCESS === Test create public & private ISO ... === TestName: test_01_create_iso | Status : SUCCESS === Test Edit ISO ... === TestName: test_02_edit_iso | Status : SUCCESS === Test delete ISO ... === TestName: test_03_delete_iso | Status : SUCCESS === Test for extract ISO ... === TestName: test_04_extract_Iso | Status : SUCCESS === Update & Test for ISO permissions ... === TestName: test_05_iso_permissions | Status : SUCCESS === Test for copy ISO from one zone to another ... SKIP: Not enough zones available to perform copy template Test delete ISO ... === TestName: test_07_list_default_iso | Status : SUCCESS === Test listing Volumes using 'ids' parameter ... === TestName: test_01_list_vo
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513678#comment-15513678 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Great!! Hopefully, we can merge this by Monday then. This is one of the good PRs we have with good description, screenshots, demo, new tests and test runs by author. (Thanks @mike-tutkowski) > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513662#comment-15513662 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi discussing with @rhtyd being able to specify a list of additional component tests to blueorgantan on the test command. Hopefully, we can get something together by tomorrow (23 Sept 2016). > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513643#comment-15513643 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 That is great. Let us wait for @blueorangutan to post the results. There still is a pending request for 'system VM integration test suites (SSVM, CPVM, and VR)' > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513623#comment-15513623 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan test matrix > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513636#comment-15513636 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @mike-tutkowski @karuturi I have asked blueorganutan to test this PR across VMware, KVM, and XenServer (I accidentally told it to all 3). > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513626#comment-15513626 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs56sp1, centos7 mgmt + vmware55u3, ubuntu mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513592#comment-15513592 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @blueorangutan matrix > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513553#comment-15513553 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell I never asked you to remove your -1. I am not even trying to convince you to remove your -1. If Vmware + nfs is such an important combination, it should be the prerequisite for every PR not just this one. I do understand the necessity of quality(which why we started with PRs in the first place) and all that is said makes sense in an ideal(or atleast corporate) world. There is lot of difference between being technically 'hard' and monetarily 'hard'. Quality is not going to improve by just waiting on test results. It will only improve if we make such an effort to run tests. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513470#comment-15513470 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell Let me run those tests next week (probably Monday) as I'm just about ready to head out on a flight to a customer site for an upcoming meeting and won't be back until the weekend. Thanks > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512591#comment-15512591 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @mike-tutkowski I only see results for the new test suites for XenServer + Managed Storage. Have you also run the entire smoke test suite with `require_hardware` set to `true`? If so, could you please add the test results to the PR? > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512583#comment-15512583 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi I am not going to debate the commonality of VMware. It is the market leader in the hypervisor space, and NFS is one of the most popular storage protocols used with it. Like the general hypervisor market, we have a large portion of our user community that relies on VMware with NFS. Therefore, I will not remove my -1 from this PR until the necessary regression tests have been run. Generally speaking, quality is the primary driver for merging PRs. Selective test coverage (both in the number of tests run and diversity of environments tests are run against) is one of the largest quality issues we are currently working to address. A test scenario being "hard" is not a valid reason to ignore it and move a PR forward. Given that quality is the primary driver for the community, then PRs must wait to be adequately tested. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512535#comment-15512535 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @jburwell 'most commonly deployed' - I doubt. As @blueorangutan is ready to test, we can wait. In general, waiting for test results on a configuration which no one has(Hardware is hard), just halts a PR with no further steps to do. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512517#comment-15512517 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi VMware with NFS primary/secondary storage. It is one of the most commonly deployed CloudStack configurations. Therefore, I am -1 on merging this PR until this regression test is performed. The good news is that blueorgangutan is now back online and will be able to run such a test shortly. @rhtyd is working to address a VMware Ansible/Marvin bug. We will kick a CentOS 7.2/VMware 5.5u3 smoke test/integration test run for this PR when it is ready. I expect that it will addressed today (22 Sept 2016). > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15512162#comment-15512162 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @mike-tutkowski and @jburwell I think nobody has the test configurations requested. There is no point waiting indefinitely on a configuration which nobody has or wants to test. Let wait for 2 more days and if no one responds, lets merge. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15510872#comment-15510872 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 Thank you, @karuturi! Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? I can't due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 (but perhaps someone is using an Advanced Zone and doesn't see the problem described in 9144). > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15509333#comment-15509333 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 I already posted the results for that configuration(a comment form @cloudmonger with test results) its all good there. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508964#comment-15508964 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @karuturi That config is actually one of the ones John is asking for. :) Smoke test suite + system VM integration test suites (SSVM, CPVM, and VR) against XenServer using Unmanaged Storage for System VMs > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9504) Fully support system VMs on managed storage
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508930#comment-15508930 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9504: Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @mike-tutkowski sorry mike. 2.b(xen+unmanaged) is what I ran. I dont have others. > Fully support system VMs on managed storage > --- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9504 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Management Server >Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: All >Reporter: Mike Tutkowski >Assignee: Mike Tutkowski > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > There are three related items for this ticket: > 1) Do not permit "custom IOPS" as a parameter when creating a system offering > (throw an exception if this parameter is passed in). > 2) If you transition managed storage into maintenance mode and system VMs > were running on that managed storage, the host-side clustered file systems > (SRs on XenServer) are not removed. Remove them. > 3) Add integration tests for system VMs with managed storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
