[jira] [Comment Edited] (CXF-7045) Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt

2016-09-16 Thread Andriy Redko (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15496718#comment-15496718
 ] 

Andriy Redko edited comment on CXF-7045 at 9/16/16 4:22 PM:


Hi Sergey,

I think it is feasible in general, but why would CXF provide a feature to 
install just Jackson? Here is basically the concern I have. F.e. if I am 
building an application and I need to install additional bundles (Jackson is 
good example, like you mentioned), I do know that and I will install them. Now, 
it happens that our own sample project has to include some additional bundles 
as well. We could make this process easier (by pre-installing some bundles, 
hopefully users will need them anyway) or ask user to do that. 

I am honestly not sure about having dedicated CXF feature for Jackson, it feels 
like that should not be the CXF responsibility but Jackson itself. However we 
do have similar use cases, f.e. *cxf-jaxb*, so I think in general it might be 
OK. So it would mean to have standalone *cxf-jackson* feature, and 
*cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger* will depend on it as well, right?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko 


was (Author: reta):
Hi Sergey,

I think it is feasible in general, but why would CXF provide a feature to 
install just Jackson? Here is basically the concern I have. F.e. if I am 
building an application and I need to install additional bundles (Jackson is 
good example, like you mentioned), I do know that and I will install them. Now, 
it happens that our own sample project has to include some additional bundles 
as well. We could make this process easier (by pre-installing some bundles, 
hopefully users will need them anyway) or ask user to do that. 

I am honestly not sure about having dedicated CXF feature for Jackson, it feels 
like that should not be the CXF responsibility but Jackson itself. However we 
do have similar use cases, f.e. cxf-jaxb, so I think in general it might be OK. 
So it would mean to have standalone *cxf_jackson* feature, and 
*cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger* will depend on it as well, right?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko 

> Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt
> --
>
> Key: CXF-7045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Samples
>Reporter: John Poth
>Assignee: Freeman Fang
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0, 3.1.8
>
>
> Update jackson version. Currently getting the error:
> {code}
> Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to resolve 
> org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0): 
> missing requirement [org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi 
> [146](R 146.0)] osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>  Unresolved requirements: 
> [[org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0)] 
> osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (CXF-7045) Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt

2016-09-16 Thread Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15496577#comment-15496577
 ] 

Sergey Beryozkin edited comment on CXF-7045 at 9/16/16 3:29 PM:


I've been wondering if we should support different scenarios and thus have few 
features.
First we should have a helper 'jackson' feature - for all the users who prefer 
to install Jackson in OSGI, this in itself not related to Swagger2.
Next we have a 'minimal' Swagger2 feature - it has all but jackson specific 
dependencies.
Finally we have a current swagger2 feature which, with option3 enforced, simply 
works - it will depend on a new jackson feature.

So if a user has already installed Jackson manually or with a new Jackson 
feature to support JSON at the application level and Swagger is needed -  then 
'minimal' Swagger2 feature is installed. Otherwise - a complete swagger2 
feature is installed.

Does it work ?
Sergey


was (Author: sergey_beryozkin):
I've been wondering if we should support difference scenarios and thus have few 
features.
First we should have a helper 'jackson' feature - for all the users who prefer 
to install Jackson in OSGI, this in itself not related to Swagger2.
Next we have a 'minimal' Swagger2 feature - it has all but jackson specific 
dependencies.
Finally we have a current swagger2 feature which, with option3 enforced, simply 
works - it will depend on a new jackson feature.

So if a user has already installed Jackson manually or with a new Jackson 
feature to support JSON at the application level and Swagger is needed -  then 
'minimal' Swagger2 feature is installed. Otherwise - a complete swagger2 
feature is installed.

Does it work ?
Sergey

> Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt
> --
>
> Key: CXF-7045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Samples
>Reporter: John Poth
>Assignee: Freeman Fang
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0, 3.1.8
>
>
> Update jackson version. Currently getting the error:
> {code}
> Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to resolve 
> org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0): 
> missing requirement [org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi 
> [146](R 146.0)] osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>  Unresolved requirements: 
> [[org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0)] 
> osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (CXF-7045) Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt

2016-09-15 Thread Andriy Redko (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15493952#comment-15493952
 ] 

Andriy Redko edited comment on CXF-7045 at 9/15/16 5:06 PM:


Hey Sergey,

No problem. So here is the thing (Swagger 2 OSGi sample):
 - yes, you see the usage of JAX-RS provider in the sample (which is part of 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts)
 - yes,  cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger lists two 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts in the feature.xml definition
 - however, they won't be installed by Karaf, because our Swagger 2 integration 
does not depend on any class from com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts (the 
respective bundles are marked with dependency="true" attribute)
 - but our Swagger 2 OSGi sample uses JacksonJsonProvider so when it is being 
installed into Karaf container, two com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs have to be 
installed manually as well

As Aki mention, previous version of Swagger had a dependency to 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs and as such, Karaf installed them as part of 
cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger feature. In this case, our samples just 
work, nothing to be done. Now, the dependency graph has changed and 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs are resolved as a unused dependencies (and as such 
skipped), so when we ask user to install sample application bundle, 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs bundles are not present and have to be installed 
manually :( Hope I included all the pieces ... :-) Please let me know if 
something is still not clear.

Thanks!

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko


was (Author: reta):
Hey Sergey,

No problem. So here is the thing (Swagger 2 OSGi sample):
 - yes, you see the usage of JAX-RS provider in the sample (which is part of 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts)
 - yes,  cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger lists two 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts in the feature.xml definition
 - however, they won't be installed by Karaf, because our Swagger 2 integration 
does not depend on any class from com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs artifacts (the 
respective bundles are marked with dependency="true" attribute)
 - but our Swagger 2 OSGi sample uses JacksonJsonProvider so when it is being 
installed into Karaf container, two com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs have to be 
installed manually as well

As Aki mention, previous version of Swagger had a dependency to 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs and as such, Karaf installed them as part of 
cxf-rt-rs-service-description-swagger feature. In this case, our samples just 
work, nothing to be done. Now, the dependency graph has changed and 
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs are resolved as a dependencies, so when we ask user 
to install sample application bundle, com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs bundles are 
not present and have to be installed manually :( Hope I included all the pieces 
... :-) Please let me know if something is still not clear.

Thanks!

Best Regards,
Andriy Redko

> Update sample description_swagger2_osgi README.txt
> --
>
> Key: CXF-7045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7045
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Samples
>Reporter: John Poth
>Assignee: Freeman Fang
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0, 3.1.8
>
>
> Update jackson version. Currently getting the error:
> {code}
> Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to resolve 
> org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0): 
> missing requirement [org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi 
> [146](R 146.0)] osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>  Unresolved requirements: 
> [[org.apache.cxf.samples.jax_rs_description_swagger2_osgi [146](R 146.0)] 
> osgi.wiring.package; 
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json)(version>=2.6.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)