Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/319#discussion_r23526978
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/Task.java ---
@@ -329,6 +330,15 @@ public void unregisterMemoryManager
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/331#issuecomment-71467375
I think it would be better not to print the help if the user specified
something incorrectly. Maybe just the error message and a note that -h prints
the help
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/319#discussion_r23526836
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/scheduler/SlotSharingGroupAssignment.java
---
@@ -42,86 +44,82 @@
public
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/319#discussion_r23526787
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/scheduler/SlotAvailabilityListener.java
---
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
import
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/333#issuecomment-71464164
-1
I think we need to add the `build-target` directory into the list of
ignored directories for apache rat. Rat will fail subsequent builds
```
1 Unknown
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/342#issuecomment-71475896
This will probably conflict with https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/316.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/322#issuecomment-71484526
I will make this change part of a new pull request for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1417.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/333#issuecomment-71469736
Oh, actually, that should work because the configuration explicitly binds
the plugin to the clean phase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/362#issuecomment-72886592
Sorry guys, I was confused with the different repositories. I'll close it
again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/358#issuecomment-72937500
Thank you.
Thats good to hear.
On 04.02.2015, at 21:56, Daniel Warneke notificati...@github.com wrote:
Tested the code and everything works
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202#issuecomment-72533930
Wordcount with build-in data works :+1: nice.
```
robert@robert-tower ...k-0.9-SNAPSHOT-bin/flink-0.9-SNAPSHOT (git)-[papipr]
% ./bin/pyflink3.sh pyflink.py
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202#discussion_r23952693
--- Diff:
flink-addons/flink-language-binding/src/main/python/org/apache/flink/languagebinding/api/python/dill/__diff.py
---
@@ -0,0 +1,247
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202#issuecomment-72526181
I've tested the changes again, because I would really like to merge them
The bin/pyflink3.sh script only works when called from the flink root dir
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/347#discussion_r23914605
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/operators/DataSink.java ---
@@ -83,6 +93,107 @@ public DataSink(DataSetT data, OutputFormatT
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/347#issuecomment-72430165
The change is good to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/335#issuecomment-73366441
I'm really sorry that I've messed up this pull request by renaming
flink-addons to flink-staging :(
I was doing it in a rush Really sorry.
---
If your project
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/358
[FLINK-592] Add support for Kerberos secured YARN setups to Flink.
This pull request is basically a port of @warneke's branch
(https://github.com/warneke/flink/tree/security) to the latest `master
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/338
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/338#issuecomment-72861601
Resolved in http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/7ac6447f.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/358#issuecomment-72856331
Thank you for the good feedback!
@mxm and I updated the pull request and addressed your concerns.
I'm now running the tests on Travis. If they pass I'm going
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/359#discussion_r24085204
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/TypeExtractor.java
---
@@ -680,10 +680,20 @@ private static void validateInputType
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/134#issuecomment-73047820
Yes, the changes here have been subsumed by FLINK-883.
@skunert can you close this pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/364
Port FLINK-1391 and FLINK-1392 to release-0.8 branch.
These commits port the fixes for the two issues (Avro and Protobuf support)
to the release-0.8 branch.
They also contain a hotfix regarding
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/366#issuecomment-73089829
Thank you for trying it out.
Ideally, with the bot in place the number of warnings will go down over
time.
I'll address the comments in the source
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/366#issuecomment-73084319
Its not completely building flink, its only generating javadocs or
compiling for getting the compiler warnings.
The main purpose of the script is to be executed
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/366#issuecomment-73254306
I found out why the qa-check has more compile errors compared to the
master: I've instructed the compiler to report them all ;)
I've addressed all comments
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/354#issuecomment-72620298
I'll close it.
I've filed a jira for the issue and assigned it to @twalthr:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1471
---
If your project is set up
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202#discussion_r23950076
--- Diff: docs/python_programming_guide.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,600 @@
+---
+title: Python Programming Guide
+---
+!--
+Licensed to the Apache
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/375#issuecomment-73477321
Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/374#issuecomment-73478511
I've tried it out locally. Looks very nice. Thank you.
+1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/304#discussion_r22968592
--- Diff: flink-java/pom.xml ---
@@ -64,6 +64,18 @@ under the License.
version0.5.1/version
/dependency
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308#issuecomment-69976328
+1 for some utilities.
I'm not sure however where to put it.
Should we add another maven module? Make it part of the current
flink-java ? Or start it as a github
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/236#issuecomment-70095528
I would like to have this merged soon.
It contains some good changes to the TypeExtractor (support for interfaces
abstract classes)
---
If your project is set up
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/315#issuecomment-70723442
I didn't find any issues in the code. Good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/326#discussion_r23252081
--- Diff:
flink-addons/flink-gelly/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/gelly/Edge.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/322
[FLINK-1392] Add Kryo serializer for Protobuf
I've checked the added dependencies and its not overriding any versions and
no transitive dependencies are added.
You can merge this pull request
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/299#issuecomment-70226685
The change looks good. I would like to see some test cases there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#issuecomment-70226947
How about names along the lines of Unmodified Fields ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#discussion_r23069617
--- Diff:
flink-compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/compiler/dag/BinaryUnionNode.java
---
@@ -266,4 +268,44 @@ public void computeOutputEstimates
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#discussion_r23069937
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/functions/SemanticPropUtil.java
---
@@ -40,38 +45,108 @@
import
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#discussion_r23070438
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/PojoTypeInfo.java
---
@@ -45,6 +46,16 @@
*/
public class PojoTypeInfoT
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#discussion_r23070841
--- Diff:
flink-compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/compiler/dag/BinaryUnionNode.java
---
@@ -266,4 +268,44 @@ public void computeOutputEstimates
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#issuecomment-70230559
Except for the comments and the missing documentation, the change looks
good.
I can however not really validate the changes in the optimizer.
---
If your project
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/304#discussion_r23071236
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/runtime/KryoSerializer.java
---
@@ -185,6 +187,8 @@ private void checkKryoInitialized
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/304#issuecomment-70231876
Change looks good except for comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/314#issuecomment-70234048
Good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/299#issuecomment-70269761
Oh, yes .. sorry. I need to be more careful when reviewing pull requests.
+1 to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/296#issuecomment-70090914
I think its fine to just merge it to the release-0.8 branch
It will then automatically go into 0.8.1. I'll create a version in JIRA
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/292#discussion_r23292258
--- Diff:
flink-yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ object ApplicationMaster{
val
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/326#discussion_r23248831
--- Diff:
flink-addons/flink-gelly/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/gelly/test/TestWeaklyConnected.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/326#issuecomment-70717064
Great, I'm super excited to see the graph API being offered to the main
project.
I'll start reviewing the code right away, to merge it as soon as possible
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/329#issuecomment-70856935
Good to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/294#issuecomment-70418596
The changes have been merged to 0.8 and master (except for FLINK-1385, but
this fix needs to be implemented differently for master. I'll do that as part
of my yarn pull
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/292#issuecomment-70416726
Thank you for the feedback. I'll address the inline comments.
Regarding the questions:
1. The separation between `flink-yarn` and `flink-yarn-tests` exists
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/305#issuecomment-70424921
Maybe we should offer users both options: register and default serializer.
In some cases, you don't know the exact types and you want to go for a
default serializer
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/383#issuecomment-73912267
Looks good to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/383#issuecomment-73916367
Rebased to master: https://github.com/rmetzger/flink/tree/kerberos_hdfs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/382#issuecomment-73917179
I'm closing the PR until I've added tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/383#issuecomment-73910366
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1504
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/382
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/378#issuecomment-73911265
The job that was previously failing is fixed with this change.
We should merge this change ASAP, because its kinda impossible right now to
seriously use flink
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/393#issuecomment-74833886
I would like to merge this pull request soon.
@aljoscha, do you agree that we can investigate the performance for the
PojoComparator also when the change is merged
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/393#issuecomment-74843995
Yes. First we need to understand why exactly the performance is so poor.
Maybe its an issue we can easily fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/405#issuecomment-74832989
One more thing, the maven module is called flink-linq. Are we certain
that we can use the name LINQ without problems here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/381#issuecomment-74120225
Looks good to me (I'm uncertain regarding the optimizer changes)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/384#issuecomment-74119549
I vote to merge this quickly and fix issues as they appear.
The change touches a lot of different parts of the code and is predestined
to become unmergeable quickly
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/386
[FLINK-1391] Register common Avro types at Kryo
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rmetzger/flink kryo081-2
Alternatively you can
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/414#discussion_r24829996
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-gelly/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/graph/example/SingleSourceShortestPathsExample.java
---
@@ -56,4 +63,77 @@ public static
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/411#discussion_r24833839
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-hcatalog/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/hcatalog/HCatInputFormatBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,413 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/399#issuecomment-74414666
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/405#discussion_r24858527
--- Diff: docs/linq.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+title: Language-Integrated Queries
+---
+!--
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/397#issuecomment-74414852
Changes look good.
Thank you for taking care of this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/427
[FLINK-1589] Add option to pass configuration to LocalExecutor
Please review the changes.
I'll add a testcase and update the documentation later today.
You can merge this pull request
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/427#issuecomment-75244751
I've added documentation and tests to the change.
Lets see if travis gives us a green light.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/411#issuecomment-74895705
Cool. Then I think the change is good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/421
[FLINK-1501] Add metrics library for monitoring TaskManagers
Hey,
I've spend some time exploring the
[metrics](https://dropwizard.github.io/metrics/3.1.0/) library for improving
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/410#issuecomment-74638095
Cool.
Lets merge this also to master and document it there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/393#issuecomment-74665100
Thank you for reviewing the pull request.
I've addressed your remark, added a fix for another issue (FLINK-1567) and
now I'll run the performance tests
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202#issuecomment-71612618
@dan-blanchard What non-JVM language are you looking for?
Maybe we can do a little prototype with that language to see how well it
works. Maybe you or somebody else
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/311#issuecomment-71613018
+1 for merging it
Whats the plan with the documentation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/333#issuecomment-71610034
In addition to that, we should probably investigate why the clean phase
is not removing the directory.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/345#issuecomment-71656804
Good to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/337#issuecomment-71631049
Merging it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/355
FLINK-1452: Rename 'flink-addons' to 'flink-staging'; add 'flink-contrib'
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rmetzger/flink
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/317#issuecomment-72319309
Okay, I'll file a JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/301#issuecomment-71366256
The only reason why I added the two variants is that I want to give users
freedom to choose between these two variants. Its one more line of code that
might (someday
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/334#discussion_r23503538
--- Diff: flink-addons/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ under the License.
version${project.version
Github user rmetzger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/334#discussion_r23503540
--- Diff:
flink-addons/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/StreamGraph.java
---
@@ -536,4 +549,79 @@ public
Github user rmetzger closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/301#issuecomment-71439040
You are right, I should have made the requirements clear in the beginning.
I actually had a discussion with the user which approach is the best.
I took the view
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/338
[Discuss] Simplify SplittableIterator interface
While working on something, I found the SplittableIterator interface
unnecessary complicated.
Let me know if you agree to merge
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/337#issuecomment-71429315
It depends on what the user does with the `HADOOP_CLASSPATH`.
In my understanding, it is meant as a variable for adding 3rd party jar
files to Hadoop. The jar files
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/301#issuecomment-71432009
I've completely changed the mechanism of setting a custom file name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/301#issuecomment-71434721
The user who requested this feature actually asked for a custom method to
overwrite.
There is one more important use-case for a custom method: If users want
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/335#issuecomment-71376640
Thank you.
Looks good. History is preserved and you addressed my comments.
+1 for merging it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/337
[FLINK-1433] Add HADOOP_CLASSPATH to start scripts
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rmetzger/flink FLINK-1433
Alternatively you
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/331#issuecomment-71376859
@mxm: Since you have some experience with the CliFrontend now, would you
mind looking into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1424 as well?
---
If your project
1 - 100 of 2231 matches
Mail list logo
