[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

sunjincheng closed FLINK-5657.
------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Move to FLINK-5803 & FLINK-5804.

> Add processing time OVER RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING aggregation to SQL
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5657
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5657
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: sunjincheng
>
> The goal of this issue is to add support for OVER RANGE aggregations on 
> processing time streams to the SQL interface.
> Queries similar to the following should be supported:
> {code}
> SELECT 
>   a, 
>   SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED 
> PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS sumB,
>   MIN(b) OVER (PARTITION BY c ORDER BY procTime() RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED 
> PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS minB
> FROM myStream
> {code}
> The following restrictions should initially apply:
> - All OVER clauses in the same SELECT clause must be exactly the same.
> - The PARTITION BY clause is optional (no partitioning results in single 
> threaded execution).
> - The ORDER BY clause may only have procTime() as parameter. procTime() is a 
> parameterless scalar function that just indicates processing time mode.
> - bounded PRECEDING is not supported (see FLINK-5654)
> - FOLLOWING is not supported.
> The restrictions will be resolved in follow up issues. If we find that some 
> of the restrictions are trivial to address, we can add the functionality in 
> this issue as well.
> This issue includes:
> - Design of the DataStream operator to compute OVER ROW aggregates
> - Translation from Calcite's RelNode representation (LogicalProject with 
> RexOver expression).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to