[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16012) Major compaction can't work because left scanner read point in RegionServer

2016-06-15 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333006#comment-15333006 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-16012 at 6/16/16 3:42 AM: - why not

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16012) Major compaction can't work because left scanner read point in RegionServer

2016-06-15 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15333006#comment-15333006 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16012: why not considered moving scannerReadPoints.put(this,

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Attachment: HBASE-15474.patch patch > Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Attachment: (was: HBASE-15474.patch) > Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-15474: -- Summary: Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak Key: HBASE-15474 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Fix Version/s: 1.1.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exception in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15199165#comment-15199165 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-15474: my patch is on the tag /ref/1.1.0, not on the master >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Description: HConnectionImplementation creates a ZooKeeperKeepAliveConnection during construction,

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Attachment: HBASE-15474-branch-1.v3.patch patch for branch 1 > Exception in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15203038#comment-15203038 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-15474: still not apply > Exception in HConnectionImplementation's

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7006) [MTTR] Improve Region Server Recovery Time - Distributed Log Replay

2016-03-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15207733#comment-15207733 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-7006: --- I may find a bug in this implementation. {code:java} @@ -283,6

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-15474) Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause Zookeeper connnections leak

2016-03-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-15474: --- Attachment: HBASE-15474v2.patch > Exception in HConnectionImplementation's constructor cause

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: FailedCase.java Attach a Unit Test to reproduce this issue > Batch Append/Increment

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: HBASE-16283.patch add a patch. One question, how can I assign this issue to me? > Batch

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15393099#comment-15393099 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-16283 at 7/26/16 2:55 AM: - Attach a Unit

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-16283: -- Summary: Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false Key: HBASE-16283 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Description: If set Append/Increment's ReturnResult attribute to false, and batch the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-25 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Description: If set Append/Increment's ReturnResult attribute to false, and batch the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15393430#comment-15393430 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16283: you mean the patch? I don't think so, since the patch only

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: HBASE-16283v2.patch fix broken unit test > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-27 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: HBASE-16283v3.patch add two test cases > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16275) Change ServerManager#onlineServers from ConcurrentHashMap to ConcurrentSkipListMap

2016-07-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391248#comment-15391248 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16275: As you said, ‘’it seems that there is no difference if there

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: FailedCase.java > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: FailedCase.java > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: (was: FailedCase.java) > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16283: --- Attachment: (was: FailedCase.java) > Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16283) Batch Append/Increment will always fail if set ReturnResults to false

2016-07-26 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15393573#comment-15393573 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16283: Those are two cases just to show the issue. I'm not intend to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16388) Prevent client threads being blocked by only one slow region server

2016-08-11 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418234#comment-15418234 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16388: I don't think throttle the thread to one server is reasonable,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16388) Prevent client threads being blocked by only one slow region server

2016-08-11 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418234#comment-15418234 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-16388 at 8/12/16 1:37 AM: - what if there

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15213) Fix increment performance regression caused by HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0

2016-07-13 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376340#comment-15376340 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-15213: Why not remove WriteQueue directly,since mvcc and the seqId are

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16238) It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in RecoverableZooKeeper

2016-07-17 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16238: --- Attachment: HBASE-16238v2.patch add a trivial change in hbase-server module to trigger tests > It's

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15213) Fix increment performance regression caused by HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0

2016-07-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15385242#comment-15385242 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-15213: After a little search, I found out that the thought of removing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-15213) Fix increment performance regression caused by HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0

2016-07-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15385242#comment-15385242 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-15213 at 7/20/16 3:12 AM: - After a little

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16245) RegionScannerImpl#nextInternal() may produce null pointer exception if scanner is closed in between

2016-07-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15385217#comment-15385217 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-16245: who will call scanner.close() while a scan is going on? >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-16245) RegionScannerImpl#nextInternal() may produce null pointer exception if scanner is closed in between

2016-07-19 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15385217#comment-15385217 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-16245 at 7/20/16 2:56 AM: - who will call

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15213) Fix increment performance regression caused by HBASE-8763 on branch-1.0

2016-07-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15385534#comment-15385534 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-15213: Yes, after HBASE-12751, MVCC changed a lot. I think the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16238) It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in RecoverableZooKeeper

2016-07-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16238: --- Fix Version/s: 1.1.5 1.2.2 0.98.20 Affects

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-16238) It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in RecoverableZooKeeper

2016-07-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-16238: -- Summary: It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in RecoverableZooKeeper Key: HBASE-16238 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16238

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16238) It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in RecoverableZooKeeper

2016-07-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-16238: --- Attachment: HBASE-16238.patch > It's useless to catch SESSIONEXPIRED exception and retry in >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17275) Assign timeout cause region unassign forever

2017-02-03 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852451#comment-15852451 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17275: {quote} Isn't there something that needs to be done for "which

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17275) Assign timeout cause region unassign forever

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855213#comment-15855213 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17275: Thanks, [~syuanjiang], your proposal can get rid of the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17264) Processing RIT with offline state will always fail to open the first time

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855105#comment-15855105 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17264: OK, I will rebase to branch-1 > Processing RIT with offline

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17275) Assign timeout cause region unassign forever

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17275: --- Attachment: HBASE-17275-branch-1.v2.patch > Assign timeout cause region unassign forever >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17265) Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855191#comment-15855191 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17265: {quote} Allan Yang, can you leverage the fix in HBASE-17023 for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17264) Processing RIT with offline state will always fail to open the first time

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855252#comment-15855252 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17264: {quote} Can you compose test for branch-1 ? {quote} Sorry,

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17264) Processing RIT with offline state will always fail to open the first time

2017-02-06 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17264: --- Attachment: (was: HBASE-17275-branch-1.v2.patch) > Processing RIT with offline state will always

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17265) Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

2017-02-07 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855574#comment-15855574 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17265: Thank you [~syuanjiang], uploaded a v2 patch, but in order to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17275) Assign timeout cause region unassign forever

2017-02-07 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17275: --- Attachment: HBASE-17275-branch-1.v3.patch attached a v3 patch following [~syuanjiang]'s advice >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17265) Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

2017-02-07 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17265: --- Attachment: HBASE-17265-branch-1.patch > Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17265) Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

2017-02-07 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17265: --- Attachment: HBASE-17265-branch-1.v2.patch > Region left unassigned in master failover when failed

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17265) Region left unassigned in master failover when failed open

2017-02-07 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17265: --- Attachment: (was: HBASE-17265-branch-1.patch) > Region left unassigned in master failover when

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: HBASE-17471.v2.patch > Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: (was: HBASE-17471.v2.patch) > Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: HBASE-17471.v2.patch Add a init patch to clarify my thought and run through the Hundson.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833822#comment-15833822 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: I think we need only synchronize the acquirement of seqid/mvcc

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833844#comment-15833844 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: Thank you for your opinion [~carp84], will rebase the code and

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833862#comment-15833862 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-17471 at 1/23/17 3:31 AM: - Actually, we

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833886#comment-15833886 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: When I say 'a lot of problems', I mean performance problem &

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833862#comment-15833862 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: Actually, we notice the performance regression after merging

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: HBASE-17471.v3.patch rerun Hudson > Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834182#comment-15834182 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: Attached HBASE-17471.v4.patch based on [~Apache9]'s

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834035#comment-15834035 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: [~Apache9] Thanks for your patch, your patch is more clear, and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834058#comment-15834058 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: OK, Thanks a lot! [~Apache9] > Region Seqid will be out of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834182#comment-15834182 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-17471 at 1/23/17 10:04 AM: -- Attached

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: HBASE-17471.v4.patch > Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-23 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834182#comment-15834182 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-17471 at 1/23/17 10:07 AM: -- Attached

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837229#comment-15837229 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: 'inMemstore' is OK I think, mvcc is only needed to ensure data

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Release Note: MVCCPreAssign is added by HBASE-16698, but pre-assign mvcc is only used in put/delete

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837210#comment-15837210 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: Sorry, replay would expect some delays 'Cause Chinese spring

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17471: --- Attachment: HBASE-17471.v6.patch Patch v6 added, only some java doc/log info added following Ted's

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17506) started mvcc transaction is not completed in branch-1

2017-01-24 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837228#comment-15837228 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17506: {quote} there will not be different nonce inside a single

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17482) mvcc mechanism fails when using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-21 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833211#comment-15833211 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17482: [~stack], we are porting mvccPreAssign to our costom 1.1.2

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17506) started mvcc transaction is not completed in branch-1

2017-01-21 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-17506: -- Summary: started mvcc transaction is not completed in branch-1 Key: HBASE-17506 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17506 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17506) started mvcc transaction is not completed in branch-1

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17506: --- Description: In {{doMiniBatchMutation}}, if it is in replay and if the the nonce of the mutation is

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17507) Add document for the mvcc preassign feature introduced in HBASE-16698

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833434#comment-15833434 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17507: I'm working on HBASE-17471 's fix, in the patch, I will always

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17507) Add document for the mvcc preassign feature introduced in HBASE-16698

2017-01-22 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833435#comment-15833435 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17507: Yes, A switch can be added, but will increase the complicity of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-21 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875656#comment-15875656 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17673: {quote} This issue has been fixed in HBASE-17256. {quote} Not

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17471) Region Seqid will be out of order in WAL if using mvccPreAssign

2017-02-21 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15877604#comment-15877604 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17471: Thanks for your perf data, [~carp84]. Sure, I will complete the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17673: --- Description: This issue has been fixed once in HBASE-14674. But, I noticed that almost all RS in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17673: --- Description: This issue has been fixed once in HBASE-14674. But, I noticed that almost all RS in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17673: --- Attachment: HBASE-17673-branch-1.patch > Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17673: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17673: --- Attachment: HBASE-17673.patch > Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17673) Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI

2017-02-20 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-17673: -- Summary: Monitored RPC Handler not show in the WebUI Key: HBASE-17673 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17673 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17482) mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-17 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827546#comment-15827546 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17482: the failed test

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17482) mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-17 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17482: --- Attachment: HBASE-17482.patch > mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17482) mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-17 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-17482: -- Summary: mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign Key: HBASE-17482 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17482 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17482) mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign

2017-01-17 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17482: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > mvcc mechanism failed when using mvccPreAssign >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824947#comment-15824947 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17475: Thanks, Duo, modified the patch as you pointed out, but use a

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
Allan Yang created HBASE-17475: -- Summary: Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much Key: HBASE-17475 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Attachment: HBASE-17475.patch > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Attachment: HBASE-17475-branch-1.v3.patch > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Attachment: HBASE-17475-branch-1.patch > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Attachment: HBASE-17475-branch-1.v2.patch > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825473#comment-15825473 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17475: Yes, it is intended to control the stack depth, also prevent the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825495#comment-15825495 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-17475: comment added in V3 > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17475) Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if retry too much

2017-01-16 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allan Yang updated HBASE-17475: --- Attachment: HBASE-17475.v2.patch modified master patch attached > Stack overflow in AsyncProcess if

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >