[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-07-31 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16106890#comment-16106890
 ] 

Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-17658:


HBASE-18480 is based on this issue. I will push this to branch-1.3 and 
branch-1.2 tomorrow if no objections. FYI [~yuzhih...@gmail.com]

> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-07-30 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16106519#comment-16106519
 ] 

Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-17658:


[~yuzhih...@gmail.com] Why not push this to the other active 1.y branches?

> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15872422#comment-15872422
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-17658:


SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #2522 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/2522/])
HBASE-17658 Fix bookkeeping error with max regions for a table (tedyu: rev 
938aef772d82f7a52228436b141e62af66e11e76)
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/TestBaseLoadBalancer.java
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/BaseLoadBalancer.java


> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15872274#comment-15872274
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-17658:


FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.4 #634 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.4/634/])
HBASE-17658 Fix bookkeeping error with max regions for a table (tedyu: rev 
6b96b0ce853b83cf445018292217f736fbff906d)
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/TestBaseLoadBalancer.java
* (edit) 
hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/balancer/BaseLoadBalancer.java


> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-17 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15871998#comment-15871998
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17658:


There was typo in the subject of the patch.
JIRA number was missing.

Here is the modified subject:
HBASE-17658 Fix bookkeeping error with max regions for a table

> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-17 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15871993#comment-15871993
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17658:


{code}
testMobGetAtomicity[1](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestAcidGuarantees)  Time 
elapsed: 21.968 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.RuntimeException: Deferred
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MultithreadedTestUtil$TestContext.checkException(MultithreadedTestUtil.java:79)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MultithreadedTestUtil$TestContext.waitFor(MultithreadedTestUtil.java:72)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestAcidGuarantees.runTestAtomicity(TestAcidGuarantees.java:388)
at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestAcidGuarantees.testMobGetAtomicity(TestAcidGuarantees.java:435)
{code}
Not related to patch.

> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-16 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15871130#comment-15871130
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17658:
---

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 37s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseanti {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not have any anti-patterns. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 5m 
17s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 1m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
55s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 
14s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 44s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
49s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 48s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 48s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
50s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
18s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
31m 33s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 or 3.0.0-alpha2. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
49s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 124m 53s 
{color} | {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
21s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 173m 23s {color} 
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.12.6 Server=1.12.6 Image:yetus/hbase:8d52d23 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12853175/JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-17658 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux dfb980fb663c 3.13.0-100-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 18 
16:48:51 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / ae840c0 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_121 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5743/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5743/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5743/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim 

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17658) Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew

2017-02-16 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15870974#comment-15870974
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17658:


+1, pending QA.

> Bookkeeping issue in BaseLoadBalancer for Table Skew
> 
>
> Key: HBASE-17658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17658
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Balancer
>Reporter: Tim Brown
>Assignee: Tim Brown
> Attachments: JIRA-17658.master.001.patch
>
>
> Currently when numMaxRegionsPerTable of a given table increases above the 
> current maximum, the value is not properly updated. This means that the cost 
> for Table Skew cannot get worse for a given region move during the balancer 
> process leading to an imbalanced cluster with respect to Table Skew.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)