[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-22941) MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() returns parent regions in random order

2019-09-20 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-22941.
---
Resolution: Fixed

Pushed the addendum to branch-2.2+.

> MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() returns parent regions in random order
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-22941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22941
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: master
>Reporter: István Tóth
>Assignee: István Tóth
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0, 2.1.7, 2.2.1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-22941-addendum.patch
>
>
> The multi-region merge patch has changed the behaviour of the 
> MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() method. Earlier, the parent regions were 
> returned in the same order that they were passed to mergeRegion().
> The patch has changed this to return the regions in random order. To be more 
> precise, the parent regions are stored in random order in Meta.
> I propose storing and returning the parent regions in ascending order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-22941) MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() returns parent regions in random order

2019-08-29 Thread stack (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack resolved HBASE-22941.
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2.2
   2.1.7
   2.3.0
   3.0.0
 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
   Resolution: Fixed

Thanks for the fix [~stoty] Took a while getting it in back to 2.1. Nice one.

> MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() returns parent regions in random order
> --
>
> Key: HBASE-22941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22941
> Project: HBase
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: master
>Reporter: István Tóth
>Assignee: István Tóth
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.3.0, 2.1.7, 2.2.2
>
>
> The multi-region merge patch has changed the behaviour of the 
> MetaTableAccessor.getMergeRegions() method. Earlier, the parent regions were 
> returned in the same order that they were passed to mergeRegion().
> The patch has changed this to return the regions in random order. To be more 
> precise, the parent regions are stored in random order in Meta.
> I propose storing and returning the parent regions in ascending order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)