[jira] [Comment Edited] (HIVE-15327) Outerjoin might produce wrong result depending on joinEmitInterval value

2016-12-01 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15712701#comment-15712701
 ] 

Jesus Camacho Rodriguez edited comment on HIVE-15327 at 12/1/16 6:47 PM:
-

Thanks [~ashutoshc]. I will modify the test case.

About the first comment, I do not understand what you mean. The only 
modification was {{!hasFilter(alias)}} by 
{{!hasFilter(condn[alias-1].getLeft()) && 
!hasFilter(condn[alias-1].getRight()}}, i.e., checking whether any of both 
inputs contains filters on the inputs instead of checking the last one, which 
would only be valid for right/full outer joins.


was (Author: jcamachorodriguez):
Thanks [~ashutoshc]. I will modify the test case.

About the first comment, I do not understand what you mean. The only 
modification was {{!hasFilter(alias)}} by 
{{!hasFilter(condn[alias-1].getLeft()) && 
!hasFilter(condn[alias-1].getRight()}}, i.e., checking whether any of both 
inputs contains filters on the inputs instead of a checking the last one one, 
which would be only valid for right/full outer joins.

> Outerjoin might produce wrong result depending on joinEmitInterval value
> 
>
> Key: HIVE-15327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15327
> Project: Hive
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Query Processor
>Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 2.2.0
>Reporter: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>Assignee: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: HIVE-15327.01.patch, HIVE-15327.patch
>
>
> If joinEmitInterval is smaller than the group size, outerjoins might produce 
> records with NULL appended values multiple times (once per group).
> HIVE-4689 targeted the same problem. However, the fix does not seem to cover 
> all cases (in particular, it will not apply to left outer joins with filter 
> conditions on the left input). The solution in HIVE-4689 was to disable 
> (override) joinEmitInterval value for those cases. This fix follows the same 
> approach.
> To reproduce the problem:
> {code}
> set hive.strict.checks.cartesian.product=false;
> set hive.join.emit.interval=1;
> CREATE TABLE test1 (key INT, value INT, col_1 STRING);
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (99, 0, 'Alice');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (99, 2, 'Mat');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (100, 1, 'Bob');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (101, 2, 'Car');
> CREATE TABLE test2 (key INT, value INT, col_2 STRING);
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (102, 2, 'Del');
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (103, 2, 'Ema');
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (104, 3, 'Fli');
> -- Equi-condition and condition on one input (left outer join)
> SELECT *
> FROM test1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2
> ON (test1.value=test2.value AND test1.key between 100 and 102)
> LIMIT 10;
> -- Condition on one input (left outer join)
> SELECT *
> FROM test1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2
> ON (test1.key between 100 and 102)
> LIMIT 10;
> {code}
> For the *first* query, current (incorrect) result is:
> {noformat}
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1001   Bob NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}
> Expected (correct) result is:
> {noformat}
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1001   Bob NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}
> For the *second* query, current (incorrect) result is:
> {noformat}
>  1012   Car 104 3   Fli
>  1001   Bob 104 3   Fli
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1001   Bob 103 2   Ema
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  1001   Bob 102 2   Del
> {noformat}
> Expected (correct) result is:
> {noformat}
>  1012   Car 104 3   Fli
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  1001   Bob 104 3   Fli
>  1001   Bob 103 2   Ema
>  1001   Bob 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (HIVE-15327) Outerjoin might produce wrong result depending on joinEmitInterval value

2016-12-01 Thread Jesus Camacho Rodriguez (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15711771#comment-15711771
 ] 

Jesus Camacho Rodriguez edited comment on HIVE-15327 at 12/1/16 11:51 AM:
--

[~ashutoshc], could you review the patch?

Issue is not reproducible with Tez join operators implementation, but I thought 
it was worth to add the additional test cases so we do not regress in the 
future.


was (Author: jcamachorodriguez):
[~ashutoshc], could you review the patch?

Issue is not reproducible with Tez join operators implementation, but I thought 
it was worth to add the tests so we do not regress in the future.

> Outerjoin might produce wrong result depending on joinEmitInterval value
> 
>
> Key: HIVE-15327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15327
> Project: Hive
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Query Processor
>Affects Versions: 1.3.0, 2.2.0
>Reporter: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>Assignee: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: HIVE-15327.patch
>
>
> If joinEmitInterval is smaller than the group size, outerjoins might produce 
> records with NULL appended values multiple times (once per group).
> HIVE-4689 targeted the same problem. However, the fix does not seem to cover 
> all cases (in particular, it will not apply to left outer joins with filter 
> conditions on the left input). The solution in HIVE-4689 was to disable 
> (override) joinEmitInterval value for those cases. This fix follows the same 
> approach.
> To reproduce the problem:
> {code}
> set hive.strict.checks.cartesian.product=false;
> set hive.join.emit.interval=1;
> CREATE TABLE test1 (key INT, value INT, col_1 STRING);
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (99, 0, 'Alice');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (99, 2, 'Mat');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (100, 1, 'Bob');
> INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (101, 2, 'Car');
> CREATE TABLE test2 (key INT, value INT, col_2 STRING);
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (102, 2, 'Del');
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (103, 2, 'Ema');
> INSERT INTO test2 VALUES (104, 3, 'Fli');
> -- Equi-condition and condition on one input (left outer join)
> SELECT *
> FROM test1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2
> ON (test1.value=test2.value AND test1.key between 100 and 102)
> LIMIT 10;
> -- Condition on one input (left outer join)
> SELECT *
> FROM test1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2
> ON (test1.key between 100 and 102)
> LIMIT 10;
> {code}
> For the *first* query, current (incorrect) result is:
> {noformat}
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1001   Bob NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}
> Expected (correct) result is:
> {noformat}
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1001   Bob NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}
> For the *second* query, current (incorrect) result is:
> {noformat}
>  1012   Car 104 3   Fli
>  1001   Bob 104 3   Fli
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1001   Bob 103 2   Ema
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  1001   Bob 102 2   Del
> {noformat}
> Expected (correct) result is:
> {noformat}
>  1012   Car 104 3   Fli
>  1012   Car 103 2   Ema
>  1012   Car 102 2   Del
>  1001   Bob 104 3   Fli
>  1001   Bob 103 2   Ema
>  1001   Bob 102 2   Del
>  99 2   Mat NULLNULLNULL
>  99 0   Alice   NULLNULLNULL
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)