[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15712678#comment-15712678
]
Andrew Blanchard edited comment on MESOS-6661 at 12/1/16 6:31 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
That makes perfect, sense. I did not realize that additional key/values were
included in the {{draining_machines}} list. Setting the "statuses" key would
certainly help make it more clear. Alternatively, it might make sense to
include some other information in the {{down_machines}} list. Perhaps a
timestamp of when the machine was set to "down", since that may differ from the
scheduled start time in the maintenance window.
edit: granted, that would be a bit more of an involved change..
was (Author: blancharda):
That makes perfect, sense. I did not realize that additional key/values were
included in the {{draining_machines}} list. Setting the "statuses" key would
certainly help make it more clear. Alternatively, it might make sense to
include some other information in the {{down_machines}} list. Perhaps a
timestamp of when the machine was set to "down", since that may differ from the
scheduled start time in the maintenance window.
> maintenance status page has inconsistent formatting
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-6661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6661
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: HTTP API
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1
> Environment: Mesos Version: 1.01
> OS: Ubuntu 16.04 (both on the client and cluster nodes)
> HTTP Interface: Chrome browser
> Reporter: Andrew Blanchard
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: formatting, http
>
> *Description*:
> The MachineID lists on the /maintenance/status page are formatted
> differently. Specifically, with one machine `down` and one machine
> `draining`, the page is formatted as shown below. Note that the
> `draining_machines` list has a label ("id") on the machine ID. This
> formatting extends to multiple items in each respective list.
> {code:xml}
> {
> "down_machines": [
> {
> "hostname": "agent2",
> "ip": "172.17.0.2"
> }
> ],
> "draining_machines": [
> {
> "id": {
> "hostname": "agent3",
> "ip": "172.17.0.3"
> }
> }
> ]
> }
> {code}
> *Steps to reproduce*:
> # Add two agents to the maintenance schedule
> # Move one agent to the down state
> # View the status page at <masterIP:port>/maintenance/status
> *Proposed solution*:
> Unify the format. Either way is fine - personally I would prefer them to both
> be in the current form of `down_machines` with no label on the MachineIDs -
> but regardless, they should be the same.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
