[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2018-05-16 Thread ijokarumawak
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
@trixpan Similar to #2018, I took the liberty of taking over this PR into 
#2704. By cherry-picking your commits into my branch, so that we can respect 
your work and, when mine is merged, this PR will be closed properly.

I've rebased with the latest master, check unit tests and expand the proxy 
supports to other AWS processors, such as DynamoDB, Kinesis and Lambda there.

@trixpan @ottobackwards @pvillard31 Please keep reviewing these stuffs at 
#2704. It's ready for finalizing review process. Thanks!


---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2018-04-24 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
@trixpan can you de-conflict?


---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2018-04-09 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
in https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2588 I have done this as well, but 
only in my processor ( scope ).  I would like to see this land.  What can be 
done to move this forward?


---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2018-03-16 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
How can these be tested?


---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2018-01-21 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
@pvillard31 will rebase and resubmit...


---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2017-07-19 Thread pvillard31
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
Thanks @trixpan, what about my comment on ``displayName``? I know this is 
kind of cosmetic but when using proper ``name``, it makes things easier when 
moving templates from one environment to another and that values should be 
changed in the process.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2017-07-18 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
hopefully fixed


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2017-07-18 Thread pvillard31
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
Hey @trixpan, regarding ``.displayName`` and ``.name``, I tend to think 
that we should use both for new properties in a processor, even though it is 
not the case for legacy properties.

Besides, some tests are now failing:

Failed tests: 
  TestDeleteS3Object.testGetPropertyDescriptors:144 size should be eq 
expected:<20> but was:<22>
  TestFetchS3Object.testGetPropertyDescriptors:181 size should be eq 
expected:<14> but was:<16>
  TestListS3.testGetPropertyDescriptors:197 size should be eq expected:<15> 
but was:<17>
  TestPutS3Object.testGetPropertyDescriptors:153 size should be eq 
expected:<28> but was:<30>



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] nifi issue #2016: NIFI-4196 - Expose AWS proxy authentication settings

2017-07-18 Thread trixpan
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2016
  
Please note the displayName settings were not added as most of the AWS 
related processors lack these


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---