[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Marcus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 oooforum (fr) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@isaks.de --- Comment #38 from oooforum (fr) --- *** Issue 100126 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephan.bergmann.secondary@ ||googlemail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #37 from Andrea Pescetti --- For considering this for 4.1.3 (in addition to the Release Manager, Patricia, opinion) we would need a QA procedure. A step-by-step process like "1. Be on Windows 7; 2. Right-click in rapid succession on 4 ODT documents on your desktop, printing all of them 3. Open Task Manager..." and so on. If user "aptitude" or others can contribute this, it would be perfect. Also note that we might be very conservative for 4.1.3; but if we remove the main concern I (as Release Manager for 4.1.2) had in accepting this for 4.1.2, i.e., lack of testing, then chances might be a bit higher. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Marcus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Marcus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Hardware|Unknown |PC --- Comment #36 from Marcus --- Thanks for your verfication. I'll forword this to our release manager. Maybe an issue for the planned 4.1.3 release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #35 from aptit...@btconnect.com --- I can confirm that Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_1759486 fixes the problem. Many thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #34 from Andrea Pescetti --- The patch for Apache OpenOffice contributed by user "aptitude" has now been committed to the Apache OpenOffice trunk. Thanks! Please do test it and report here. To do that, you will need a development snapshot of Apache OpenOffice 4.2.0 (an unofficial pre-release version) that can be found here: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ You likely want the last file there, about 135M. Revision number must be higher than 1759486, so you'll need to try about 24 hours from now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #33 from SVN Robot --- "pescetti" committed SVN revision 1759486 into trunk: #i114963# Enable IPC before OpenClients to allow client connections when prin... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #32 from Ramiro --- > Ramiro; > This is the bug reporting system for Apache OpenOffice and has no formal > connection with LibreOffice system. Indeed. Sorry for the mess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Keith N. McKenna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@apache.org --- Comment #31 from Keith N. McKenna --- (In reply to Ramiro from comment #29) > I'd like to state that Libre Office 5.1.4.2 (build ID > f99d75f39f1c57ebdd7ffc5f42867c12031db97a) still has this problem on Windows > 7. Ramiro; This is the bug reporting system for Apache OpenOffice and has no formal connection with LibreOffice system. To report this bug in LibreOffice you need to report to them. See the documentation at the following link for help on submitting bugs to LibreOffice: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #30 from Andrea Pescetti --- The OpenOffice buildbots have been back to regular operations for a few weeks. We'll commit the patch to trunk later this week, but then please provide feedback with a build from https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ after the update. More information coming in the next days. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Ramiro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramiro.p.magalh...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #29 from Ramiro --- I'd like to state that Libre Office 5.1.4.2 (build ID f99d75f39f1c57ebdd7ffc5f42867c12031db97a) still has this problem on Windows 7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 oooforum changed: What|Removed |Added Issue Type|DEFECT |PATCH CC||ooofo...@free.fr --- Comment #28 from oooforum --- Set issue type as PATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #27 from aptit...@btconnect.com --- I do not believe that anyone has tested it (except me). It probably will be a good idea to include it into the development windows build. This bug will only affect a few users that require printing multiple files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Andrea Pescetti changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 CC||pesce...@apache.org --- Comment #26 from Andrea Pescetti --- Adding to Kay's comment: there are a number of people who commented on this issue over the months, even years. It still remains a uncommonly reported issue by the OpenOffice standards, but a patch is now available (thanks!) and I wonder how many have tested it. If we include it into trunk and produce a development Windows build that includes it, will testing become easier for those of you who can replicate the problem? Is anyone already running a modified version of OpenOffice which includes this patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Kay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ksch...@apache.org --- Comment #25 from Kay --- Patch needs review by the API folks. Not tested yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are on the CC list for the issue.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 Artem Dudnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schart...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 aptit...@btconnect.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aptit...@btconnect.com --- Comment #23 from aptit...@btconnect.com --- This bug still occurs in OpenOffice 4.1.0 In can easily be replicated by using ::ShellExecuteEx() with "print" as the verb in SHELLEXECUTEINFO. If you call it repeatedly without a pause in-between, then only the first print occurs and multiple soffice.bin and soffice.exe tasks are active in the windows task manager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 114963] multiple instances of soffice.exe
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114963 --- Comment #24 from aptit...@btconnect.com --- Created attachment 83383 --> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83383&action=edit Enable IPC before OpenClients to allow client connections when printing Fixed as follows: Enable IPC thread before OpenClients This is because it is possible for another client to connect during the OpenClients() call. This can happen on Windows when document is printed (not opened) and another client wants to print (when printing multiple documents). If the IPC thread is enabled after OpenClients, then the client will not be processed because the application will exit after printing. i.e OfficeIPCThread::AreRequestsPending() will always return false ALSO: Multiple clients may request simultaneous connections. When this server closes down it attempts to recreate the pipe (in DisableOfficeIPCThread()). It's possible that the client has a pending connection request. When the IPC thread is not running, this connection locks (because maPipe.accept()) is never called -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue. You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
