[GitHub] rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError
rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3941#issuecomment-412188985 See https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/f6046721acd801ea1777cb5cb040dfaa6922a18e/tests/src/test/scala/whisk/core/limits/MaxActionDurationTests.scala This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError
rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3941#issuecomment-412188134 I think there is such a test I’ll try to find it. For the second part I don’t think it matters. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError
rabbah commented on issue #3941: to address #3918, reuse a container on applicationError URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3941#issuecomment-412024187 It’s better - would you want to reuse the container if it timed out? You’d end up with a concurrent activation for example. +1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
