[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] ocket8888 commented on issue #3893: Add a database constraint preventing assigning Servers from one CDN to a DeliveryService on a different CDN.
ocket commented on issue #3893: Add a database constraint preventing assigning Servers from one CDN to a DeliveryService on a different CDN. URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/3893#issuecomment-527986640 > _" I wouldn't think an API constraint would need a discussion"_ It doesn't, necessarily. But I think a DB constraint does merit it. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [trafficcontrol] ocket8888 commented on issue #3893: Add a database constraint preventing assigning Servers from one CDN to a DeliveryService on a different CDN.
ocket commented on issue #3893: Add a database constraint preventing assigning Servers from one CDN to a DeliveryService on a different CDN. URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/3893#issuecomment-527934357 This is technically a breaking change, right? I think the exact phrase I've heard is "[we] shouldn't hold an upgrade hostage over database state". So I think this needs to go to the mailing list for the whole deprecation process. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
