CVS commit by ossi:
don't crash in imap driver when Host is not specified.
M +4 -4 drv_imap.c 1.29
--- isync/src/drv_imap.c #1.28:1.29
@@ -1350,10 +1350,10 @@ imap_open_store( store_conf_t *conf,
info ("Logging in...\n");
if (!srvc->user) {
-
CVS commit by ossi:
be *slightly* more explicit about which options Tunnel makes
superfluous.
M +2 -1 mbsync.1 1.5
--- isync/src/mbsync.1 #1.4:1.5
@@ -234,5 +234,6 @@
Specify a command to run to establish a connection rather than opening a TCP
socket. This allows you to run an IM
CVS commit by ossi:
un-document "Host imaps:[...]" syntax and introduce new option UseIMAPS
instead.
apply ted's patch to support UseIMAPS in conjunction with Tunnel.
document that SSLv2 is No Good (TM).
M +9 -6 drv_imap.c 1.28
M +17 -10mbsync.1 1.4
--- isync/src/drv_imap.c
On Sunday 28 May 2006 16:37, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> not sure. the major thing that stops me from just implementing it is the
> handling of INBOX. is INBOX.box also to be treated like INBOX, just with
> something appended?
To my experience as far, it's just handled perfectly, and the whole sit
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Daniel Danner wrote:
> On Sunday 28 May 2006 12:54, Daniel Danner wrote:
> > In which way will these "flattened" folders be put into the slave? And wont
> > everything get confused when I try to push the "flattened" folders to the
> > server again?
>
> Wel
On Sunday 28 May 2006 12:54, Daniel Danner wrote:
> In which way will these "flattened" folders be put into the slave? And wont
> everything get confused when I try to push the "flattened" folders to the
> server again?
Well, allright. I already tried it out, and it looks like it just works fine.
CVS commit by ossi:
move assigning default port to the place of use
M +5 -5 drv_imap.c 1.27
--- isync/src/drv_imap.c #1.26:1.27
@@ -1262,5 +1262,9 @@ imap_open_store( store_conf_t *conf,
} else {
memset( &addr, 0, sizeof(addr) );
- addr.sin_port
On Sunday 28 May 2006 12:32, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Daniel Danner wrote:
> > Since I recently got a new mailbox, where subfolders are supported, I
> > just wondered if mbsync is really incapable of synchronizing all
> > folders recursively, or if I jus
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Daniel Danner wrote:
> Since I recently got a new mailbox, where subfolders are supported, I
> just wondered if mbsync is really incapable of synchronizing all
> folders recursively, or if I just did something wrong?
>
if your mailbox uses a dot as a path
Hello there,
I was using mbsync for a while with flat IMAP folders (no subfolders in
folders), which worked fine (great piece of software, btw!).
Since I recently got a new mailbox, where subfolders are supported, I just
wondered if mbsync is really incapable of synchronizing all folders
recur
10 matches
Mail list logo
