Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version]

2006-11-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:36:34PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > But someone might be expecting this buggy behavior, and might then > experience data loss. But a big warning in the package NEWS.Debian file > would be anough, as far as I am concerned. > make it a post-install blurb like the one

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version]

2006-11-09 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 06:40:15PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:11:01 +010, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > I just tried 1.0.3 (at last) and to be honnest I am slightly > > disappointed. I found a few behavioral differences: > > 1) when User was not specified, 0.9.2 u

[commit] isync_1_0_branch: isync/src/compat

2006-11-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
CVS commit by ossi: backport: make compat wrapper default to current user for imap login M +6 -0 main.c 1.5.2.2 --- isync/src/compat/main.c #1.5.2.1:1.5.2.2 @@ -23,4 +23,5 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -168,4 +169,9 @@ main( int argc, char **argv )

[commit] isync/src/compat

2006-11-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
CVS commit by ossi: make compat wrapper default to current user for imap login M +6 -0 main.c 1.8 --- isync/src/compat/main.c #1.7:1.8 @@ -23,4 +23,5 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -168,4 +169,9 @@ main( int argc, char **argv ) /* XXX the preced

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version]

2006-11-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:11:01 +010, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > I just tried 1.0.3 (at last) and to be honnest I am slightly > disappointed. I found a few behavioral differences: > 1) when User was not specified, 0.9.2 used the name of the user > running isync; 1.0.3 fails; > indeed, will fix.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#315423: isync: new upstream version]

2006-11-09 Thread Tino Keitel
Hi, Nicolas Boullis, the Debian maintainer for isync, sent me the attached report. I think that 2) can be seen as a feature and not as a bug (at least I see it this way), but 1) and 3) look like regressions compared to isync 0.9.2. I'll also try to reproduce these issues to re-check them. Regards