On Wed 25 Sep 2013 at 09:14:54PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:34:31PM -0500, guns wrote:
> > The changes are done conservatively, and the style is in line with the
> > rest of the code. I am happy to make any and all amendments that you
> > propose and will be awai
hi,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:34:31PM -0500, guns wrote:
> The changes are done conservatively, and the style is in line with the
> rest of the code. I am happy to make any and all amendments that you
> propose and will be awaiting your response.
>
i took a somewhat more aggressive and "creative
commit de2664d8b399bd15f5ae72369bd96df10de90f8c
Author: Oswald Buddenhagen
Date: Wed Sep 25 17:51:24 2013 +0200
make paths relative to CWD, after all
the test suite actually relies on it. it would be possible to adjust it,
but there is not much reason to make paths relative to
hi,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:10:41AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> I see this has already been reported on the mailing list:
>
yes, and a few days before that as well.
> But there was no response I could see in the archive.
>
i was on vacation. ^^
> >>> 9 UID FETCH 1:70 (UID FLAGS)
> * 1 FETCH
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 08:55:03PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> - if (!memcmp( arg + strlen( arg ) - 5, ".lock", 5 )) /* workaround
> broken servers */
> + l = strlen ( arg );
> + if (l >= 5 && !memcmp( arg + l - 5, ".lock", 5 )) /* workaround broken
> servers */
>
good point. anyway
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:03:41AM +0200, Marius wrote:
> Patterns ![user.adminteam]*
>
that would need to be
Patterns ![user.adminteam]* *
or something like that.
note that isync 1.0.x does not support recursive folders. try git master
if you actually need a hierarchy (you don't if you have ev