On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:40:52AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> One issue with the -q option is that when there an error, the name of
> the folder is not shown in the error message. So whenever the output
> of -q shows some errors, I have to run the thing again without -q just
> to be abl
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 04:39:33PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 03:42:18PM +0200, Tamas Papp wrote:
> > I am wondering if there could be an intermediate form of display which
> > does not require a TTY but still provides an indication or progress, eg
> > each time the
