On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 04:33:32PM -0800, Hong Xu wrote:
However, consumer-grade hardware is prone to RAM bit flips, at a higher
rate than what most people probably think. The most recent research I
knew is discussed on Wikipedia [2], which shows the error rate was on
the magnitude of 1 bit error
On 2025-01-13 Mon 04:25 GMT-08, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:33:54AM -0800, Hong Xu wrote:
>>Does isync perform any checks (like some checksum) to prevent data loss
>>in an event of RAM error?
>>
> no, and the idea doesn't even make much sense. there would have to be a
