On 2025-01-13 Mon 04:25 GMT-08, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:33:54AM -0800, Hong Xu wrote:
>>Does isync perform any checks (like some checksum) to prevent data loss
>>in an event of RAM error?
>>
> no, and the idea doesn't even make much se
Hi all,
I'm interested in understanding whether isync is capable of preventing
data loss in case of RAM errors.
Bit corruption in RAM is a low-probability event but does happen. ECC
memories [1] exist to address this concern. However, today, most
personal computers use non-ECC memories and are
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:55:57 -0700 Oswald Buddenhagen
<oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> wrote
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 05:26:38PM -0700, Hong Xu wrote:
> I've found this issue after I deleted some labels on the server side
> (Gmail). After the deletion and the first
Hi,
I've found this issue after I deleted some labels on the server side
(Gmail). After the deletion and the first sync using mbsync, the labels
on the server came back. Also I have the following message for the
deleted label:
Error: UIDVALIDITY of master changed (got 62, expected 51)
D
