On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:21:54AM +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen [2016-12-03 18:03]:
> > then the next guess would be that libsasl2-modules is not installed.
>
> At least, on my system, libsasl2-modules is installed.
>
yeah, while testing my fixes, i found that you'd get at least E
* Oswald Buddenhagen [2016-12-03 18:03]:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > peter's oringinal problem is probably actually expected behavior:
>
> > when the connection is not encrypted,
> >
> actually, nonsense, the -V log says it is encrypted.
> then the ne
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 05:37:47PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> peter's oringinal problem is probably actually expected behavior:
> when the connection is not encrypted,
>
actually, nonsense, the -V log says it is encrypted.
then the next guess would be that libsasl2-modules is not installed
* Oswald Buddenhagen [2016-12-03 17:38]:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 12:40:34PM +, david wen riccardi-zhu wrote:
> > Connection is now encrypted
> > * OK IMAP4 ready
> > >>> 1 CAPABILITY
> > * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS IDLE AUTH=PLAIN
> > 1 OK completed
> > Logging in
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 12:40:34PM +, david wen riccardi-zhu wrote:
> Connection is now encrypted
> * OK IMAP4 ready
> >>> 1 CAPABILITY
> * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS IDLE AUTH=PLAIN
> 1 OK completed
> Logging in...
> IMAP error: authentication mechanism PLAIN is not
This is mine:
Reading configuration file /home/user/.mbsyncrc
Channel example
Opening master store example-remote...
Resolving mail.example.com... ok
Connecting to mail.example.com (xx.xx.xx.xxx:993)...
Opening slave store example-local...
Connection is now encrypted
* OK IMAP4 ready
>>> 1 CAPAB
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 03:47:01AM +, david wen riccardi-zhu wrote:
> Glad to hear! I'd made the same assumption.
> Not sure if something is broken,
>
sounds like it. a -Dn dump from such a failing session would be
interesting.
Glad to hear! I'd made the same assumption. Not sure if something is
broken, if the documentation needs to be updated, or if users need to be
better informed. : )
---
dwrz|朱为文
On 2016-12-01 18:57, Peter P. wrote:
> * dwrz [2016-12-01 16:19]:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Just a shot in the dark -- h
* dwrz [2016-12-01 16:19]:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Just a shot in the dark -- have you tried setting AuthMechs to LOGIN?
And back from the dark I report that this works. Please excuse me, I did
misunderstand the manpage saying approximately that "AuthMechs defaults
to * and all mechanismes deemed secure
