On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 13:05:23 -0800, Chris Frost wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the answer and explanation. Does this mean that only one
> computer can mbsync with a given imap mail store and retrieve new
> mail?
No. A second mbsync on another computer still gets those messages that
don't have the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:23:49PM -0800, Chris Frost wrote:
> > Is there a way to keep the new flag on the remote store's message?
> >
> currently not.
> in principle, imap allows fetching messages without resetting the
> \Rece
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:23:49 -0800, Chris Frost wrote:
> When I run mbsync on a remote store and it copies over a message it sees
> for the first time, mbsync causes the new flag to be removed and an old
> flag to be added to the remote store's message. The local store's message
I think that t
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:23:49PM -0800, Chris Frost wrote:
> Is there a way to keep the new flag on the remote store's message?
>
currently not.
in principle, imap allows fetching messages without resetting the
\Recent flag (this is called peeking). however, handling of this flag is
very inconsi
