hello people,
i would like to know if it's dangerous to replace
mbsync -qaCnN
by
sed 's/^Channel \+//;t;d' ~/.mbsyncrc |
xargs -P4 -IX mbsync -qCnN X
to make my mail sync faster. i fear something like caching corruption.
any advice?
regards
marc
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:41:44PM +0100, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> i would like to know if it's dangerous to [parallelize] to make my
> mail sync faster. i fear something like caching corruption.
>
> any advice?
>
each mailbox has entirely separate files. also, see first paragraph of
man page ...
* Oswald Buddenhagen [2019-03-04 23:19]:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:41:44PM +0100, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> > i would like to know if it's dangerous to [parallelize] to make my
> > mail sync faster. i fear something like caching corruption.
I do run GNU parallel with separate instances of mbsync
