sam smith wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can find out more information about the
> PdfStamper bug that was fixed in version 141? I didn't see it in the
> bug database.
Oops, the bug database...
I hardly ever check that SourceForge feature,
nor the support request page. I thought people
did
It was a bug introduced in 140. To know more do a diff and see
what was changed.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sam
smithSent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:23 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [iText-questions]
New release itext-paulo
Does anyone know where I can find out more information about the PdfStamper bug that was fixed in version 141? I didn't see it in the bug database.
Thanks,
Sam
- fixed a bug in PdfStamper with form flattening and fields added
Paulo Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changes in itext-paulo-141 (20
Changes in itext-paulo-141 (2004-11-10)
- all the current CVS changes
- fixed a bug in PdfStamper with form flattening and fields added
- PdfStamper will keep the acroform even if flattening. The acroform
can
also be used by other annotations to keep the resources
- added
